Acton Intellectual Property Lawyer, Montana

Sponsored Law Firm


Antoinette M Tease

Patent
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  29 Years

G. Trenton Hooper

Criminal, Toxic Mold & Tort, Property & Casualty, International Intellectual Property
Status:  In Good Standing           

Jean Hogstad

Patent, Legal Malpractice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Acton Intellectual Property Lawyers and Acton Intellectual Property Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Intellectual Property practice areas such as Copyright, International Intellectual Property, Patent and Trademark matters.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Peters

... 5 The State opposed the Appellants' motions, arguing it had no better access to the source code than Appellants, as the source code is possessed and controlled exclusively as intellectual property by CMI, Inc. (CMI), a Kentucky-based corporation. ...

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SYSTEMS, LLC v. Scobie

... However, Scobie would not have been able to perform his job without this equipment. The value of these items lies not in the value of the raw materials from which they are made but rather in the intellectual property value of their contents. ...

Buhmann v. State

... 143 (I-143), which was approved by the citizens of Montana on November 7, 2000, constituted a taking of their private property and that they were entitled to just compensation for this taking. ... It insured compensation only in those cases where property was taken. ...