Aurora Criminal Lawyer, Colorado

Sponsored Law Firm


Randy B. Corporon Lawyer

Randy B. Corporon

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Civil Rights, Traffic
Unbundled Services Offered!

The attorneys at the Law Offices of Randy B. Corporon PC vast experience will bring the best solution and results to your individual legal difficultie... (more)

David Lee Owen Lawyer

David Lee Owen

VERIFIED
Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act, White Collar Crime
Criminal Defense - Federal and State

Lawyer.com Member Questionnaire Please describe a case(s) in the last year or two where you made a big difference. I handled many cases last y... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-635-8660

Wayne  Vaden Lawyer

Wayne Vaden

VERIFIED
Estate, Real Estate, Criminal, Wills & Probate

Wayne Vaden is a practicing lawyer in the state of Colorado. Mr. Vaden received his J.D. from Arizona State University in 1991.

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-897-2640

Leonard R. Higdon Lawyer

Leonard R. Higdon

VERIFIED
Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal
We Will Help You Evaluate Options We Will Protect Your Interests

Leonard Higdon has lived in Colorado since 1985. Raised in Hawaii, he moved to Colorado to attend Fort Lewis College in Durango, where he received his... (more)

Speak with Lawyer.com
Jeffrey M. Laski Lawyer

Jeffrey M. Laski

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic, Accident & Injury

At the law firm of Jeffrey M. Laski, Attorney at Law, he has 32 years experience serving a very diverse clientele in a broad range of criminal defense... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-697-8981

William Ellery Peters Lawyer

William Ellery Peters

VERIFIED
DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

With over 35 years of experience in representing some of the most difficult DUI cases in Colorado, Colorado Advance legal is there to protect you from... (more)

Michael William Gross Lawyer

Michael William Gross

VERIFIED
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Motor Vehicle, Real Estate, Federal Appellate Practice

Attorney Gross is a practicing lawyer in the state of Colorado.

Mark P. Miller Lawyer

Mark P. Miller

VERIFIED
Criminal, Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation, Estate, Administrative Law

Mark P. Miller turned a passion for helping people in need into a rewarding law career. And it all started while he was serving our country in the U.S... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

303-922-5900

Michael P. Litman Lawyer

Michael P. Litman

VERIFIED
Immigration, Car Accident, Accident & Injury, Wrongful Death, Criminal

Michael P. Litman has spent his entire legal career protecting the rights of individuals against large corporate and governmental agencies. These indi... (more)

James J. Peters Lawyer

James J. Peters

VERIFIED
Criminal, Traffic, Accident & Injury

James J. Peters is a practicing lawyer in the state of Colorado.

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Display Sponsorship

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Aurora Criminal Lawyers and Aurora Criminal Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Criminal practice areas such as DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act, White Collar Crime and Traffic matters.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)
A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)
A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)
A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)
Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)
Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)
A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)
A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)
A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)
An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Thomas

... II. Untimeliness of Appeal. CAR 4(b) governs criminal appeals and requires that an appeal must be filed within forty-five days of entry of the judgment or order being appealed. ... P. 35. The rules of criminal procedure do not authorize a motion to reconsider postconviction orders. ...

People v. Martinez

... Once inside, the officer observed neither evidence of drug activity nor other criminal activity by any person inside the house, including the defendant. ... The stop was not based on a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and therefore constituted an unconstitutional seizure. ...

People v. Thompson

... We hold that the Colorado Criminal Justice Records Act ("the 1144 CCJRA"), sections 24-72-301 to -309, CRS (2007), requires the indictment to be released for public inspection in its entirety, subject only to the deletion of identifying information of any alleged sexual assault ...