Aurora DUI-DWI Lawyer, Colorado

Sponsored Law Firm


Jeffrey M. Laski Lawyer

Jeffrey M. Laski

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic, Accident & Injury

At the law firm of Jeffrey M. Laski, Attorney at Law, he has 32 years experience serving a very diverse clientele in a broad range of criminal defense... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-692-2150

Lonn Matthew Heymann Lawyer

Lonn Matthew Heymann

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic

The attorneys at Lonn Heymann Law Firm, P.C. have years of experience in both civil and criminal cases. We bring that experience to bear for every cas... (more)

Mark Edward Kraynak Lawyer

Mark Edward Kraynak

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, Lawsuit & Dispute

Mark E. Kraynak is an experienced criminal defense lawyer. He represents people charged with felonies, misdemeanors as well as lesser charges. Clic... (more)

Loren James Randall Lawyer

Loren James Randall

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Estate, Bankruptcy

We genuinely care about people. Good people sometimes find themselves in bad circumstances... and legal problems are often the most stressful challeng... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-789-7351

Ryan James Peterson Lawyer

Ryan James Peterson

VERIFIED
Bankruptcy & Debt, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

My name is Ryan Peterson and I am the attorney/owner of The Law Office of Ryan Peterson, LLC. My firm stands out because I handle each case personally... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

303-945-5822

Eric John Wessels Lawyer

Eric John Wessels

VERIFIED
Criminal, Felony, DUI-DWI

Eric developed his passion for law as an undergraduate in Austin, Texas. During law school at the University of Indiana at Bloomington, Eric focused... (more)

Daniel C. Mossinghoff

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Jeffrey Alan Wolf

White Collar Crime, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Charles L Fife

Federal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Melissa Danielle Trollinger

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Display Sponsorship

TIPS

Easily find Aurora DUI-DWI Lawyers and Aurora DUI-DWI Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act, White Collar Crime, Traffic and Juvenile Law attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)
A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)
The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)
A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)
The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)
Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)
A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)
A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Baldwin v. Huber

... Accordingly, we affirm. I. Factual and Procedural Background. After licensee was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) on November 30, 2007, she took a breath test at the police station within two hours of the time of driving. ...

People v. Grassi

... Finally, we conclude that driving under the influence (DUI) is a lesser included offense of vehicular homicide. ... IV. Finally, defendant contends, and the People concede, that his DUI conviction is a lesser included offense of vehicular homicide. We agree. ...

People v. VanMatre

... Although neither the DUI nor the DARP statute expressly includes vehicle operability as an element of the offense, defendant contends the ... P.2d 167, 170-71 (Alaska Ct.App.1994) ("reasonably capable of being rendered operable" is a requirement for DWI conviction), abrogated ...