Honesty, integrity and capacity. Honesty that the attorney does not promise something that they could not possibly achieve on behalf of the client. Integrity that the attorney can achieve the results that they promise, which should be nothing more than a promise to advocate to the best of that attorney's ability, and integrity that the attorney maintains the experience and knowledge to effectively advocate for the client. If the attorney is not experienced in a particular area of law, accepting the client's money for the benefit of the cash flow at the detriment of lacking the experience to advocate in that area of law is a violation of that client's trust and a compromise of the attorney's integrity. Most clients believe that an attorney knows all areas of law, but law is like medicine in that an attorney who practices personal injury does not necessarily know how to effectively practice family law. Similarly, a person would not seek medical attention for neck pain from a podiatrist, foot doctor. Capacity is the attorney's ability to perform their duties on behalf of their clients. If an attorney is a member of a small practice, or a solo practitioner, and incapable of financing a case on a contingency due to the significant expense necessary for the costs, yet accepts the matter regardless due to the sheer value of the claim, then the client's matter in itself will be compromised. Clients should not only evaluate the attorney's ability, but the capacity of the firm for which the attorney is employed, particularly on a contingency matter. If the law firm does not have the financial capacity to fund a case that will require significant cost expenditures, the matter will innately be handicapped to the attorney's ability to fund the costs.