Atlaw Law Firm

Mr. Levy was conflicted by his prior business association with one of the Defendants in my case. Mr. Levy failed to properly notify me of this conflict and in fact colluded with this Defendant at trial to coerce me into a series of absolutely unethical one sided settlement talks designed to only benefit this Defendant, and relieve Mr. Levy of his duty of litigating the case he was unprepared for. nnMind you Mr. Levy was only retained to litigate my case at trial, as the entire case file was already fully prepped for trial by my prior counsel. Mr. LEvy's idea of a "fair" was the exact same offensive one I had already rejected offered by this Defendant during my last mediation. So Mr. Levy already knew my position on the offensive $15,000 offer in exchange for my $500k promissory Note as he was at that mediation.nnMr. Levy was incompetent in his performance of his legal services. Such as but not limited to; nna) Mr. Levy's misinformed me of the time when trial started, having me show up a half hour late. nnb) Mr. Levy came to trial unprepared, and misinformed even though the casefile was fully prepped for trial by my previous counsel. This was demonstrated by Mr. Levy getting critical facts wrong in his opening presentation such as my legal name when I signed the agreements. Whether or not I used counsel to draft the agreements, and even the timeline of events. I even tried to speak up because Mr. Levy was so wrong so many times that it was harming my case.nnc) Mr. Levy did repeatedly coerce me with threats he alleged came from Judge at trial. To benefit his prior business associate.nnd) Mr. Levy refused to make any counter offers for settlement to the Defendants when I requested him several times to do so.nne) Mr. Levy refused to examine the Defendants when I instructed him to do so, claiming he could be disbarred for intentionally exposing their criminality in violating the MED rules and other statutes.nnf) Mr. Levy refused to return to the courtroom when I instructed him to do so several times during his forced settlement talks.nng) Mr. Levy threatened to walk out on me if he would not "make a deal" with the Defendants.nnh) Mr. Levy returned to the courtroom and made the false claim I had "agreed", when I clearly did not fully understand the alleged terms as I stated on the record twice. Nor would I have every agreed to any stipulation removing my claims to my promissory note worth at least $500,000, and or my private home worth at least $450,000 for $15,000. An Attorney's function is to protect his client's interests and not railroad them into unjust settlements to avoid the complexity of a case. No one in their right mind believes $15,000 in exchange for near $1,000,000.00 in assets plus legal fees is in Plaintiff's best interests.nnI) Mr. Levy also waived his legal fees both verbally in front of a witness, and then in an email as an inducement. He then turned around and filed a charging lien because he is a lying windbag of an Attorney. Essentially the $15k settlement was really the Defendant's bribe to Mr. Levy to throw my case. I have the emails to substantiate all this so if anyone wants to see feel free to contact me.nnJ) I can say without any hesitation on my part that this is the most dishonest con artist I have ever had the displeasure of retaining. For his hourly rate you should RUN not walk in the direction of a reputable firm like Springer and Steinberg who I have also retained. I now have to sue this con artist to get any measure of justice.nnBUYER BEWARE MR. LEVY IS A LIAR!