Haworth RICO Act Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Lindsay Bernstein
About | Practice Areas
Cohen & Bernstein, L.L.C.
1360 Clifton Ave #309 Clifton, NJ 07012» view map
Criminal Defense
We’re In this Together!

We work hand in hand with our clients to ensure all of your questions are answered and progress through your legal issue is seamless.

800-978-7341
1. Lindsay Bernstein Clifton, NJ
  Attorney at Law- NJ, 2006
  Syracuse University College of Law, J.D. 2006
2. AboutCohen & Bernstein, L.L.C.
  We’re In this Together!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Haworth RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Haworth Criminal lawyers.

Leonard J Tarantino

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Car Accident

Leonard J Tarantino is a practicing lawyer in the state of New Jersey.

CONTACT

201-880-7834

2 University Plaza, Hackensack, NJ 07601

Joseph R. Donahue

Litigation, State and Local, Employment, White Collar Crime, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

70 Grand Avenue, River Edge, NJ 07661

Michael J. Kozoriz

Contract, Criminal, Defamation & Slander, Disability

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

The Atrium, East 80 Route 4, Paramus, NJ 07652

Henry G. Klein

Criminal, Bankruptcy Litigation, Bankruptcy, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

15 Engle Street, Englewood, NJ 07631

Christopher M. DiLorenzo

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Motor Vehicle

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

One University Plaza, Hackensack, NJ 07601

Paul B. Brickfield

Litigation, Criminal, Corporate, Personal Injury, Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

70 Grand Ave, River Edge, NJ 07661

Jerry Elashmawy

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

193 Route 17 South, 203, Paramus, NJ 07652

Walter K. Schreyer

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Credit & Debt, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

189 Kinderkamack Road, Westwood, NJ 07675

E. Gregory M. Cannarozzi

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

470 Grant Ave, Oradell, NJ 07649

Paul Boyton Brickfield

Traffic, Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

70 Grand Ave, River Edge, NJ 07661

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Haworth RICO Act Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

Cohen & Bernstein, L.L.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Leonard J Tarantino

Joseph R. Donahue

Michael J. Kozoriz

Henry G. Klein

Christopher M. DiLorenzo

Paul B. Brickfield

Jerry Elashmawy

Walter K. Schreyer

E. Gregory M. Cannarozzi

Paul Boyton Brickfield

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ARRAIGNMENT

PLEA

MENS REA

JURY NULLIFICATION

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SEARCH WARRANT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details