Holts Summit DUI-DWI Lawyer, Missouri

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Shackelford
About | Practice Areas
Law Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.
929 MO-22 P.O. Box 142 Centralia, MO 65240» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
The Highest Quality Of Service

We strive to educate our clients and inform them of their options so we can get them the best results. We are committed to providing the highest quality of service.

800-971-5130
1. Jason Shackelford Centralia, MO
  Attorney at Law - MO, 2001
  Regent University J.D. 2000
2. AboutLaw Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.
  The Highest Quality Of Service
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Adam Dowling

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Personal Injury, DUI-DWI, Wrongful Death

Adam’s practice at Eng & Woods Attorneys at Law includes extensive specializations in the area of criminal law. He represents felony and misdemeanor... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

573-874-4190

903 E. Ash Street, Columbia, MO 65201

Thomas Robbins Thomas Robbins

DUI-DWI, State Appellate Practice, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

300B E. High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Todd Irelan

Household Mold, Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

237 East High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Kimberly Renee Kollmeyer

Commercial Real Estate, Traffic, Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Jefferson City, MO 65110

Kevin Patrick O'Brien

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

28 N. Eighth Street, Columbia, MO 65201

Christopher L Braddock

Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

224 N 8th Street, Columbia, MO 65201

L. G. Copeland

Car Accident, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Railroad Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

900 E Broadway, Columbia, MO 65201

Megan Fewell

Administrative Law, Collection, Medical Malpractice, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

401 Locust St., Columbia, MO 65201

Eric M. Jasso

Criminal, Corporate, Traffic, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Columbia, MO 65205

Michael Hamilton

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

25 North 9th Street, Columbia, MO 65201

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Turner v. State

... He correctly argues that one of the prior DWI offenses used to enhance the penalty from a class A misdemeanor to a class D felony should not have been considered. After opinion by the Court of Appeals, Western District, this Court granted transfer. Mo. Const, art. V, Â§ 10. ...

Ross v. Director of Revenue

... She then was placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated (DWI), a charge to which she later pleaded guilty. See sec. 577.010, RSMo 2000. [2]. After her arrest for DWI, the officer read Ross the implied consent law for chemical testing. ...

State v. Collins

... PER CURIAM. Faron Ross Collins appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), section 577.010, [1] following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Douglas County. ... Mr. Collins does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to prove that he was guilty of DWI. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Holts Summit DUI-DWI Lawyer, Missouri

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Adam Dowling

Thomas Robbins Thomas Robbins

Todd Irelan

Kimberly Renee Kollmeyer

Kevin Patrick O'Brien

Christopher L Braddock

L. G. Copeland

Megan Fewell

Eric M. Jasso

Michael Hamilton

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

SENTENCE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INTENTIONAL TORT

NOLO CONTENDERE

FEDERAL COURT

INFORMED CONSENT

PROSECUTE

LARCENY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Turner v. State

Ross v. Director of Revenue

State v. Collins

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details