Jackson Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Tricia Terry
About | Articles
Marrs & Terry, PLLC
6553 Jackson Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103Â» view map
Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal Defense, Estate
Personalized, Efficient Counsel

Marrs & Terry, PLLC have been helping individuals face a variety of legal challenges, including bankruptcy, estate planning and administration, and family law.

800-862-7221
1. Tricia Terry Ann Arbor, MI
  Attorney at Law- MI, 1999
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D.
2. AboutExperienced Michigan Lawyer
  For more information about Tricia Terry
3. Articles
  Click here to read some legal arcticles published by Tricia Terry
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael S. Rosenthal

Lawsuit & Dispute, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

503 S. Jackson, Jackson, MI 49203

Philip C. Curtis

Immigration, Social Security, Criminal, Contract

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1737 Spring Arbor Rd, Jackson, MI 49203

Charles A. Perlos

Traffic, Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

154 W Michigan Ave, Jackson, MI 49201

Alfred P. Brandt

Motor Vehicle, Medicare & Medicaid, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

180 W Michigan Ave, Jackson, MI 49201

Michael B. Dungan

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic, Motor Vehicle

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

503 S Jackson St, Jackson, MI 49203

Michael J. Klaeren

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

312 S Jackson St, Jackson, MI 49201

Daniel A. Goostrey

Real Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

312 S Jackson St, Jackson, MI 49201

Sean F. Carroll

Traffic, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

233 W Washington Ave, Jackson, MI 49201

Darryl R. Mazur

Consumer Bankruptcy, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

4203 Aspen Way, Jackson, MI 49201

Susan M. Dehncke

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

740 W Michigan Ave, Jackson, MI 49204

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Jackson Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

HABEAS CORPUS

PLEA BARGAIN

GRAND JURY

CONVICTION

DIRECTED VERDICT

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

BURDEN OF PROOF

INTENTIONAL TORT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details