Sterling Heights Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Nickolas Kenny Hannawa

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic

Nickolas K Hannawa is a successful attorney who has been practicing law in Michigan since 2014. He is also a business and property owner, entrepreneur... (more)

CONTACT

800-817-5321

2909 E Big Beaver Rd, Troy, MI 48083

Gary R. Lazar

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal

Gary R. Lazar is a practicing lawyer in the state of Michigan handling criminal defense matters.

CONTACT

586-707-3914

3466 Arden Dr, Warren, MI 48092

Arthur A. Garton

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Car Accident, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Business

Arthur (Art) A. Garton handles all matters of complex criminal law, family law, personal injury and business/civil litigation. He is one of two Macomb... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-854-6940

38550 Garfield Road, Clinton Township, MI 48038

Gary R. Sanfield

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Family Law

Gary Sanfield, an experienced, aggressive, and effective Michigan attorney has over 40 years of experience and he is ready to fight for you. His excel... (more)

CONTACT

586-228-2000

42645 Garfield Rd, Clinton Township, MI 48038

Brent Jaffe

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Traffic

Upon passing the bar Attorney Brent Jaffe joined his father's firm to form Jaffe Law Group. "I was drawn to the practice of law because this professio... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-609-6130

30701 Barrington Street, Madison Heights, MI 48071

Elliot D. Margolis

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Mr. Margolis has been rated “highly qualified” by judges and other attorneys, according to legal rating service Martindale-Hubbell. He is a member... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-813-2601

2304 East Eleven Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48067

David J. Poulton

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic

David Poulton is a practicing lawyer in the state of Michigan. He received his J.D from Michigan State University College of Law in 1998.

CONTACT

800-765-0481

710 N Crooks Rd, Clawson, MI 48017

Shawn J. Coppins

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Bankruptcy, Traffic

Mr. Coppins was born and raised in the Metro-Detroit area and is a Litigation Specialist

Shawn Coppins is an aggressive plaintiff's attorney and is one of the firm's founding partners.Mr. Coppins was born and raised in the Metro-Detroit ar... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-928-4120

44 First Street, Mount Clemens, MI 48043

Paul J. Streetman

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Estate Planning, Tax, Family Law

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

248-342-6653

431 6Th St, Rochester, MI 48307

Dean Elliott

✓ VERIFIED

Civil & Human Rights, Criminal, Employment, Accident & Injury, Business

Co-Counsel on the largest police misconduct verdict in Michigan history and the largest verdict in Michigan this year! On November 3, 2016, a jury in... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-724-2091

201 East Fourth Street, Royal Oak, MI 48067

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

DISCOVERY

A formal investigation -- governed by court rules -- that is conducted before trial. Discovery allows one party to question other parties, and sometimes witness... (more...)

A formal investigation -- governed by court rules -- that is conducted before trial. Discovery allows one party to question other parties, and sometimes witnesses. It also allows one party to force the others to produce requested documents or other physical evidence. The most common types of discovery are interrogatories, consisting of written questions the other party must answer under penalty of perjury, and depositions, which involve an in-person session at which one party to a lawsuit has the opportunity to ask oral questions of the other party or her witnesses under oath while a written transcript is made by a court reporter. Other types of pretrial discovery consist of written requests to produce documents and requests for admissions, by which one party asks the other to admit or deny key facts in the case. One major purpose of discovery is to assess the strength or weakness of an opponent's case, with the idea of opening settlement talks. Another is to gather information to use at trial. Discovery is also present in criminal cases, in which by law the prosecutor must turn over to the defense any witness statements and any evidence that might tend to exonerate the defendant. Depending on the rules of the court, the defendant may also be obliged to share evidence with the prosecutor.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE

Testimony or other evidence that fails to meet state or federal court rules governing the types of evidence that can be presented to a judge or jury. The main r... (more...)

Testimony or other evidence that fails to meet state or federal court rules governing the types of evidence that can be presented to a judge or jury. The main reason why evidence is ruled inadmissible is because it falls into a category deemed so unreliable that a court should not consider it as part of a deciding a case --for example, hearsay evidence, or an expert's opinion that is not based on facts generally accepted in the field. Evidence will also be declared inadmissible if it suffers from some other defect--for example, as compared to its value, it will take too long to present or risks enflaming the jury, as might be the case with graphic pictures of a homicide victim. In addition, in criminal cases, evidence that is gathered using illegal methods is commonly ruled inadmissible. Because the rules of evidence are so complicated (and because contesting lawyers waste so much time arguing over them) there is a strong trend towards using mediation or arbitration to resolve civil disputes. In mediation and arbitration, virtually all evidence can be considered. See evidence, admissible evidence.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Sterling Heights Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Nickolas Kenny Hannawa

Gary R. Lazar

Arthur A. Garton

Gary R. Sanfield

Brent Jaffe

Elliot D. Margolis

David J. Poulton

Shawn J. Coppins

Paul J. Streetman

Dean Elliott

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

INSANITY

IMPRISON

MISTRIAL

FEDERAL COURT

DISCOVERY

CHARGE

INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details