Romulus Misdemeanor Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ray Richards
About | Practice Areas
Richards & Associates, PLLC
200 East Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48083Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Accomplished Criminal Defense Attorney

If you face criminal charges, you deserve an experienced defense lawyer who has a reputation for winning the tough cases.

800-844-5250
1. Ray Richards Troy, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1997
  Ohio Northern University J.D. 1996
2. AboutRichards & Associates, PLLC
  Top 100 Criminal Lawyer by National Trial Lawyers
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Thomas S. Piotrowski

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Estate, Felony, White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor

Thomas Piotrowski is an experienced and aggressive litigator who handles cases in and around the Detroit metro area. Since graduating cum laude from t... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-893-2781

105 Pearl St, Ypsilanti, MI 48197

Christopher Wayne Quinn II

✓ VERIFIED

Felony, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Traffic, Bankruptcy

Criminal Defense Attorney Handeling Felony and Misdemeanor Cases

At the law offices of Quinn and associates our motto is knowledge, excellence, and determination. The professionals at The Law Offices of Quinn & Asso... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-645-3790

400 Monroe, Suite 290, Detroit, MI 48226

Brent Jaffe

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Traffic

Upon passing the bar Attorney Brent Jaffe joined his father's firm to form Jaffe Law Group. "I was drawn to the practice of law because this professio... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-609-6130

30701 Barrington Street, Madison Heights, MI 48071

Stacey M. Washington

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

214 South Main Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Nickolas Darin

Divorce & Family Law, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

21917 Garrison, Dearborn, MI 48124

Lillian F. Diallo

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

65 Cadillac Square, Detroit, MI 48227

Gary Goldin

Traffic, Social Security, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

28411 Northwestern Hwy., Southfield, MI 48034

Pamela Michelle Sossi

Litigation, Misdemeanor, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

400 Monroe St, Detroit, MI 48226

Daniel Hajji

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

30300 Northwestern Highway, Farmington, MI 48334

David Rudoi

DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

7 West Square Lake Rd., Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

... And that was that. So, the People have to show that the defendant entered without permission, for the purpose of committing a misdemeanor, taking property, or committing a felony. That his body did go in, so he entered without the owner's permission. ...

People v. Sadows

... and remand for further proceedings. 96 I. In Docket No. 286689, defendant, Colleen Sadows, was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), MCL 257.625(1), a misdemeanor. Because Sadows was previously ...

People v. Reid

... SAWYER, J. This case presents the question whether the circuit court possesses the jurisdiction 160 to try a defendant on a misdemeanor charge when the accompanying felony charge was dismissed before the beginning of trial. ... Thus, only the misdemeanor charge remained. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Romulus Misdemeanor Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Richards & Associates, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Thomas S. Piotrowski

Christopher Wayne Quinn II

Brent Jaffe

Stacey M. Washington

Nickolas Darin

Lillian F. Diallo

Gary Goldin

Pamela Michelle Sossi

Daniel Hajji

David Rudoi

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

NOLO CONTENDERE

ARRAIGNMENT

DIRECTED VERDICT

CRIME

NOLLE PROSEQUI

BURDEN OF PROOF

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

MCNAGHTEN RULE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

People v. Sadows

People v. Reid

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details