Sacramento Patent Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm


James M. Ritchey

Patent, Intellectual Property, Biotechnology
Status:  In Good Standing           

Clifford Forrest Rey

Trademark, Patent
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  31 Years

John P. Costello

Trademark, Patent, Copyright, Intellectual Property
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  32 Years

John Paul Costello

Trademark, Patent, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           

Michael Sapoznikow

Trademark, Patent, Copyright, Internet
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  20 Years

James Harrison Salter

Trademark, Patent, Copyright, Federal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  36 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Sacramento Patent Lawyers and Sacramento Patent Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Intellectual Property areas including Copyright, International Intellectual Property and Trademark attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Lockwood v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton

... We conclude that Lockwood's complaint arises under the patent laws of the United States and therefore is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts under section 1338 of title 28 of the United States Code (section 1338). ...

Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP

... LLP. Landmark contends that its complaint for legal malpractice in patent prosecution raised no substantial issue of federal patent law and the superior court therefore erred in ruling that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We ...

City of Hope Nat. Med. Center v. Genentech

... of clerk's transcript and has generated 18 friend-of-the-court briefs, the primary issue is whether, as the jury found, a fiduciary relationship necessarily arose when City of Hope, in return for royalties, entrusted a secret scientific discovery to Genentech to develop, to patent, and to ...