Taylors RICO Act Lawyer, South Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

David Braghirol
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices Of David A. Braghirol
126 East Main Street Duncan, SC 29334Â» view map
Criminal Law
Proudly Serving South Carolina

Call today to talk to an experienced criminal defense lawyer.

800-296-8980
1. David Braghirol Duncan, SC
  Attorney at Law - SC, 1997
  University of South Carolina J.D. 1997
2. AboutLaw Offices Of David Braghirol
  David Braghirol is a criminal defense attorney located in Duncan, South Carolina.
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Taylors RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Taylors Criminal lawyers.

W. Chris Castro

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Landlord-Tenant, Lawsuit & Dispute

Fighting for Your Rights.

Attorney W. Chris Castro is a solo practitioner and the founder of the Castro Law Firm, LLC located in Greenville, South Carolina. His practice prima... (more)

CONTACT

800-819-9580

601 East McBee Avenue, Greenville, SC 29601

James Stone Craven

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property, Business

James Craven proudly serves Greenville, South Carolina and the neighboring communities in the areas of criminal defense, divorce & family, lawsuit & d... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-838-4280

600 East Washington St, Greenville, SC 29601

Erika Denise Baldwin

✓ VERIFIED

Felony, Misdemeanor

Erika Denise Baldwin is a practicing lawyer in South Carolina handling criminal defense matters.

CONTACT

864-630-8503

819 E North St, Greenville, SC 29601

Jefferson G. Wood

Criminal, Family Law, Insurance, Personal Injury, Products Liability

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

604 Pettigru Street, Greenville, SC 29601

Richard H. Warder

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

15 Primrose Street, Greenville, SC 29601

J. Kirk Fisher

Criminal, Environmental Law, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Social Security -- Disability

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

115 Broadus Ave., Greenville, SC 29601

Ken Norsworthy

Family Law, Criminal, Credit & Debt, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

104 Trade Street, Greer, SC 29651

John M. Rollins

Real Estate, Wills & Probate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

219 Randall St., Greer, SC 29651

William Ashley Jordan

Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Criminal, Workers' Compensation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

622 Wade Hampton Boulevard, Greenville, SC 29609

Thomas J. Quinn

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

109 Laurens Road, Greenville, SC 29607

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Taylors RICO Act Lawyer, South Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices Of David A. Braghirol

SPONSORED LAWYERS

W. Chris Castro

James Stone Craven

Erika Denise Baldwin

Jefferson G. Wood

Richard H. Warder

J. Kirk Fisher

Ken Norsworthy

John M. Rollins

William Ashley Jordan

Thomas J. Quinn

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

LINEUP

MCNAGHTEN RULE

MENS REA

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

EAVESDROPPING

ACTUS REUS

ARRAIGNMENT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details