Watertown Defamation & Slander Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm


Anthony S Bottar

Land Use & Zoning, Insurance, Personal Injury, Legal Malpractice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Rand R. Timmerman

Real Estate, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  45 Years

Nortz Pllc

Real Estate, Estate, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Watertown Defamation & Slander Lawyers and Watertown Defamation & Slander Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Accident & Injury areas including Animal Bite, Asbestos & Mesothelioma, Aviation Accident, Car Accident, Malpractice, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Property Damage, Railroad Injury, Slip & Fall Accident, Toxic Mold & Tort, Wrongful Death and Workers' Compensation attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Epifani v. Johnson

... slander per se, and citing the Restatement [Second] of Torts § 571, Comment g, which lists crimes actionable as per se slander, including, inter ... of fact, are deemed privileged and, no matter how offensive, cannot be the subject of an action to recover damages for defamation]). ...

Mann v. Abel

... Expressions of opinion, as opposed to assertions of fact, are deemed privileged and, no matter how offensive, cannot be the subject of an action for defamation (see Weiner v Doubleday & Co., 74 NY2d 586, 593 [1989], cert denied 495 US 930 [1990], citing Steinhilber v ...

Rufeh v. Schwartz

... in his trade, business, or profession. This category of slander per se "is limited to defamation of a kind incompatible with the proper conduct of the business, trade, profession or office itself. The statement 1005 must be made ...