Bakersfield DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Art Gharibian
About | Practice Areas
Gharibian Law, APC
101 North Brand Blvd. Suite 1970 Glendale, CA 91203» view map
Medical Malpractice Law
Respect Your Elders

Our dedicated legal team can help your family reconcile with elder abuse, personal injury, and wrongful death.

877-875-1119
1. Art Gharibian Glendale, CA
  Attorney at Law, CA
  Southwestern University School of Law, J.D. 2011
2. AboutGharibian Law, APC
  Respect Your Elders
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Medical Malpractice Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

John David Underwood

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Estate

John D. Underwood is a California attorney. He has been a certified member in good standing of the state bar since 2008. John has worked in the corpor... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-978-1810

1712 19th St, Bakersfield, CA 93301

John Tello

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

432 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301

Mark J. Madrigali

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2124 F Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301

Jesse K. Whitten

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1712 19Th Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301

Richard Orville Middlebrook

DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

5201 California Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93309

John Tello

Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

432 Truxtun Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93301

Sam Van Eerden

Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1620 Mill Rock Way, Bakersfield, CA 93311

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

... liquor" in violation of the generic DUI law. (Id., 772 A.2d at pp. 1088, 1091.) The Vermont Supreme Court agreed. (Id. at p. 1091.) The court observed that "any evidence raising a doubt as to [the] defendant's condition, which is the ultimate question in a generic DWI prosecution . ...

People v. Landon

... OPINION. LAMBDEN, J.â€”. On August 14, 2008, defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI) with a blood-alcohol level greater than 0.08 percent (Veh. Code, Â§ 23152, subd. (b)); she admitted four prior DUI 1099 convictions. ...

People v. Patel

... In exchange for a grant of probation, defendant Javid Patel entered negotiated pleas of no contest to alternative felony counts of "generic" and "per se" [1] negligent driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) that resulted in bodily injury to another, and a misdemeanor count of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bakersfield DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Gharibian Law, APC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John David Underwood

John Tello

Mark J. Madrigali

Jesse K. Whitten

Richard Orville Middlebrook

John Tello

Sam Van Eerden

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

PROSECUTE

MENS REA

JURY NULLIFICATION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

INFORMED CONSENT

ACCOMPLICE

SPECIFIC INTENT

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

People v. Landon

People v. Patel

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details