Codington County, SD RICO Act Lawyers, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Codington RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Codington lawyers.

Robert L. Timm

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Codington County Courthouse, 14 1st Ave. SE, Watertown, SD 57201

Ronald K. Roehr

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Codington County Courthouse, 14 1st Ave. SE, Watertown, SD 57201

Rebecca Morlock Reeves

Divorce & Family Law

Status:

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

Nancy J. Turbak Berry

Landlord-Tenant, Motor Vehicle, Health Care Other, Wills & Probate

Status:

CONTACT

26 S Broadway, Watertown, SD 57201

Robert J. Wagner

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

Bret A. Holien

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

Thomas Beadnell

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 67 Years

CONTACT

222 N Lake Dr, Watertown, SD 57201

Nancy Turbak

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

Stanton Earl Storm

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

20 N Maple, Watertown, SD 57201

Michael John Larson

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Codington County, SD RICO Act Lawyers, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert L. Timm

Ronald K. Roehr

Rebecca Morlock Reeves

Nancy J. Turbak Berry

Robert J. Wagner

Bret A. Holien

Thomas Beadnell

Nancy Turbak

Stanton Earl Storm

Michael John Larson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

LARCENY

NOLLE PROSEQUI

SPECIFIC INTENT

FEDERAL COURT

DIRECTED VERDICT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 70