Happy Jack DUI-DWI Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Happy Jack DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Happy Jack Criminal lawyers.

Richard Remender

Alcoholic Beverages, Animal Bite, Mesothelioma, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

360 Vista Grande Court, Sedona, AZ 86336

Thomas A. Gorman

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Constitutional Law, Antitrust

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

300 Apache Trail, Sedona, AZ 86339

Ronald C Ramsey

Criminal, State Government, Public Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

102 Roadrunner Dr, Sedona, AZ 86336

Ronald C Ramsey

State Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

102 Roadrunner Dr, Sedona, AZ 86336

Richard J Ruffatto

Criminal, Business & Trade, Construction, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

25 Bell Rock Plaza, Sedona, AZ 86351

Peter A Gersten

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

75 Bell Rock Plaza, Sedona, AZ 86351

Mikkel Mik Jordahl

Family Law, Criminal, Wrongful Death, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

Sedona, AZ 86340

Lisa Weiler-Parsons

Criminal, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

102 Roadrunner Drive, Sedona, AZ 86336

Lisa Weiler-Parsons

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

102 Roadrunner Drive, Sedona, AZ 86336

Renee K Mendelsohn

Immigration, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

Sedona, AZ 86340

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Noceo

... 1 In the summer of 2007, appellee Edward Noceo and petitioner Michael Harris were separately arrested and charged with driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). ... 4 After being arrested for DUI in August 2007, Noceo consented to a blood draw at the scene. ...

State v. Miller

... The state asserts the RAJI instruction misstates the law by adding an element to the crime of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). ... 285, Â¶ 2, 34 P.3d 394, 395 (App.2001) (granting special action jurisdiction to address state's objection to jury instructions in DUI case). ...

Potter v. Vanderpool

... Justice Court. Petitioner Carol Ann Potter was cited for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), driving with an alcohol concentration (AC) of .08 or more, 1259 and driving with an AC of .15 or more (extreme DUI). Potter's ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Happy Jack DUI-DWI Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Richard Remender

Thomas A. Gorman

Ronald C Ramsey

Ronald C Ramsey

Richard J Ruffatto

Peter A Gersten

Mikkel Mik Jordahl

Lisa Weiler-Parsons

Lisa Weiler-Parsons

Renee K Mendelsohn

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

BURDEN OF PROOF

LINEUP

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

PLEA

INTENTIONAL TORT

JURY NULLIFICATION

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

SENTENCE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Noceo

State v. Miller

Potter v. Vanderpool

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details