Pleasant Ridge Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Thomas Piotrowski
About | Practice Areas
The Law Office of Thomas Piotrowski
105 Pearl St Ypsilanti, MI 48197Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Proudly Serving Washtenaw County

You need an attorney with criminal defense knowledge who will vigorously protect your rights and interests.

800-893-2781
1. Thomas Piotrowski Ypsilanti, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1987
  Michigan State University J.D. 1987
2. AboutThe Law Office of Thomas Piotrowski
  Over 30 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Shawn Danette Glaza

Bankruptcy, Criminal, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

920 Hoffman Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Ryan S. Kaluzny

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

203 S Troy St, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Nadine Sabah Jamil

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

313 E Hudson Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Mitchell Ribitwer

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

26862 Woodward Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Jerome Sabbota

Other, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

26862 Woodward Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Randall J. Secontine

Pension & Benefits, Family Law, Criminal, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

401 N Main St, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Russell Reid Abrutyn

Litigation, Immigration, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3765 12 Mile Rd, Berkley, MI 48072

Bradley J. Hobbs

Natural Resources, Criminal, Contract, Collection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

1000 N Blair Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Scott Robert Reizen

Industry Specialties, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

28000 Woodward Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Marina Liane Chupac

Juvenile Law, Traffic, Deportation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

1719 Crooks Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48067

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewi... (more...)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewing police arrest reports, deciding whether to bring criminal charges against arrested people and prosecuting criminal cases in court. The D.A. may also supervise other attorneys, called Deputy District Attorneys or Assistant District Attorneys. In some states a District Attorney may be called a Prosecuting Attorney, County Attorney or State's Attorney. In the federal system, the equivalent to the D.A. is a United States Attorney. The country has many U.S. Attorneys, each appointed by the President, who supervise regional offices staffed with prosecutors called Assistant United States Attorneys.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Pleasant Ridge Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Office of Thomas Piotrowski

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Shawn Danette Glaza

Ryan S. Kaluzny

Nadine Sabah Jamil

Mitchell Ribitwer

Jerome Sabbota

Randall J. Secontine

Russell Reid Abrutyn

Bradley J. Hobbs

Scott Robert Reizen

Marina Liane Chupac

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

JURY NULLIFICATION

LARCENY

GRAND JURY

BURGLARY

HUNG JURY

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

DIRECTED VERDICT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details