within 15 miles of Ancram practice in Accident & Injury New York

... and "I . . . advised him to restrict his activities," plaintiff still fails to offer competent medical proof that he could not perform substantially 187 all his daily activities for 90 of the first 180 days following the accident "because of an injury or impairment caused by the accident" (Rossi v ...

... The defendants met their prima facie burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955 ...

... dismissal of the complaints. We find only one of those grounds to warrant discussion: Defendants in Perl claim that there was insufficient evidence of a causal connection between Perl's accident and his injury. They assert that here ...