within 15 miles of Spring Valley practice in Intellectual Property New York

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Weiss And Arons, LLP

Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property, Business, Wrongful Termination, Workers' Compensation

Law Office Of Michael J. Mahon

Other, Real Estate, Defect and Lemon Law, Patent

Law Offices Of K. D. Rothman, P.C.

Civil Rights, Slip & Fall Accident, Consumer Protection, Patent

Savad Churgin Attorneys At LAW

Landlord-Tenant, Immigration, Industry Specialties, Intellectual Property, Business

Ellen B Holtzman ESQ

Family Law, Patent, Divorce & Family Law, Misdemeanor, Lawsuit & Dispute

Stanley J Yavner

Intellectual Property, Lawsuit & Dispute, Business

Esbin & Alter, LLP

Patent, Immigration, Employment Discrimination, Divorce & Family Law, Business

Michael P. Paul Esq.

Criminal, International, Intellectual Property, Government, Industry Specialties

The Law Office Of Samuel S. Coe

Child Support, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Intellectual Property

Pitkofsky PLLC

Business, Employment, Estate, Intellectual Property, Lawsuit & Dispute


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Rice v. Miller

... Examples are various categories of intellectual property and the right to payment of a loan of funds that is not evidenced by chattel paper or an instrument. As used in the definition of `general intangible,' `things in action' includes ...

Wandel v. Eisenberg

60 AD3d 77 (2009). 871 NYS2d 102. ARNOLD WANDEL, Derivatively on Behalf of BED BATH & BEYOND, INC., Appellant, v. WARREN EISENBERG et al., Respondents, and BED BATH & BEYOND, INC., Nominal Defendant-Respondent. ...

Matter of Lever

... The only omission was the testimony of two character witnesses. The first character witness, the chair of the intellectual property practice at a law firm, testified that he first met respondent in 1998, when he was respondent's supervising attorney at a New York City law firm. ...

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.