within 100 miles of Stanford practice in Intellectual Property Kentucky


Gaddis & Matthews, PLLC

Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property, Other, Accident & Injury

Jamie W McGloin-King PLLC

Intellectual Property, Corporate

Lynch Cox Gilman & Goodman PSC

Tax, Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Criminal, Property Damage

Middleton Reutlinger

Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Environmental Law, Business, Property Damage

Frost Brown Todd LLC

Bankruptcy, Employee Rights, Estate Planning, Patent, Litigation

Dean Dorton Allen Ford, Pllc

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark

Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP

Tax, Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Property Damage, Bankruptcy

Valenti Hanley PLLC

Securities, Patent, Trademark, Corporate Governance, Credit & Debt

Lewis & Lewis, P.C.

Workers' Compensation, Landlord-Tenant, Civil Rights, Visa, Patent

Hagenbuch & Hagenbuch, Pllc

Criminal, Intellectual Property, Divorce & Family Law

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Papa John's Intern., Inc. v. McCoy

... easily transferable to the franchise relationship." [26] After considering the fact that a franchise is a commercial arrangement between two businesses and the unique aspects of such an arrangement—franchisee authorized to use the franchisor's intellectual property and brand ...

Mickler v. Mickler

... $111,809.03 for her share in Andrew's medical practice, half the proceeds from the sale of the marital residence and another piece of property, her car ... The obvious purpose of the [relevant Pennsylvania statute] is to protect earnings produced by physical or intellectual effort. . . . ...

Gaskill v. Robbins

... It may not be acquired by the mere expenditure of money. It is simply an intellectual achievement that may potentially assist in the future acquisition of property ... [. Id. at 331 (quoting Mahoney v. Mahoney, 182 NJSuper. 598, 442 A.2d 1062, 1066 (1982)). ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.