within 300 miles of Ashtabula practice in Tax Ohio

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Baker & Hostetler

Litigation, Corporate, Tax, Employee Rights, Commercial Bankruptcy

Law Clinic, Cleveland Marshall

Government, Transactions, Commercial Real Estate, Tax

Sandhu Law Group Llc

Tax, Corporate, Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate

Kohrman Jackson and Krantz PLL

Corporate, Family Law, Commercial Real Estate, Litigation, Tax

Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber LLP

Personal Injury, Tax, Construction, Lawsuit & Dispute, Immigration

Burke & Horrigan

Corporate, Estate Planning, Trusts, Tax, Commercial Banks

Ritzler, Coughlin & Paglia, Ltd.

Tax, Landlord-Tenant, Criminal, Consumer Rights, Power of Attorney

Kelley & Ferraro

Car Accident, Employment, Income Tax, Criminal, Social Security

Mcdonald Hopkins Co Lpa

Litigation, Social Security, Misdemeanor, Pension & Benefits, Tax

Bender Alexander And Broome, Co. Lpa

Corporate, Estate Planning, Trusts, Tax, Commercial Real Estate


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellee, v. KUNKLE et al., Appellant. ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Fulton County. ... {¶ 2} "The trial court erred in finding appellant in criminal contempt of court for allegedly giving false testimony at a July, 2004 judgment debtor ...

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Lomaz

{¶ 2} The trial docket before this court shows that the underlying civil action has been pending since July 1998, when appellee filed a creditor's bill against appellant. In its complaint, appellee asserted that it had not been able to collect on a judgment lien that it had obtained ...

CUMMINS PROPERTY v. FRANKLIN CTY.

... Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 NE2d 782, when it considered and rejected various arguments against using a recent, arm's-length sale price to determine the value of property for taxation purposes. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.