within 15 miles of Clayton practice in Tax Ohio

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Dean Edward Hines Co., Lpa

Divorce & Family Law, Tax

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Martin Browne Hull And Harper Pll

Personal Injury, Litigation, Commercial Banks, Tax

Martin Folino

Corporate, Trusts, Estate Planning, Tax, Construction

E.S. Gallon & Associates

Power of Attorney, Tax, Real Estate, Motor Vehicle, Lawsuit & Dispute

Hemenway Law Office, LLC

Employee Rights, Litigation, Insurance, Tax, Corporate

Law Office Of Martina Dillon

Trusts, Commercial Real Estate, Tax, Criminal, Estate Planning

Nolan Sprowl & Smith

Estate Planning, Trusts, Tax, Litigation, Commercial Real Estate

Bgl Real Estate Advisors

Administrative Law, Tax, Corporate, Commercial Banks

Dinsmore and Shohl LLP

Corporate, Trusts, Estate Planning, Tax, Intellectual Property

Tamms Law Office, Llc

Contract, Civil Rights, Employee Rights, State Appellate Practice, Tax


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellee, v. KUNKLE et al., Appellant. ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Fulton County. ... {¶ 2} "The trial court erred in finding appellant in criminal contempt of court for allegedly giving false testimony at a July, 2004 judgment debtor ...

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Lomaz

{¶ 2} The trial docket before this court shows that the underlying civil action has been pending since July 1998, when appellee filed a creditor's bill against appellant. In its complaint, appellee asserted that it had not been able to collect on a judgment lien that it had obtained ...

CUMMINS PROPERTY v. FRANKLIN CTY.

... Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 NE2d 782, when it considered and rejected various arguments against using a recent, arm's-length sale price to determine the value of property for taxation purposes. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.