within 2 miles of Cleveland practice in Tax Ohio

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Koblentz & Penvose, LLC

Power of Attorney, Income Tax, Traffic, Lawsuit, Other

Margolius, Margolius & Assoc

Social Security, Power of Attorney, Income Tax, Real Estate Other, Motor Vehicle

Climaco Wilcox Peca & Garofoli

Corporate, Litigation, Employee Rights, Tax, Bankruptcy

Schuckit & Associates Pc

Corporate, Employee Rights, Tax

Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC

Employee Rights, Litigation, Civil Rights, Corporate, Tax

Kaman & Cusimano, LLC

Immigration, Tax, Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Consumer Protection

Squire Patton Boggs (Us) Llp

Environmental Law, Tax, Litigation, Elder Law, Estate Planning

Jonetta J. Kapusta-Dorogi, Llc

Elder Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Tax, Real Estate, Family Law

Harold Jarnicki & Associates

Education, Contract, Tax, Commercial Banks

Lustig, Evans & Lucas Co., LPA

Estate Planning, Trusts, Tax, Elder Law, Employee Rights


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellee, v. KUNKLE et al., Appellant. ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Fulton County. ... {¶ 2} "The trial court erred in finding appellant in criminal contempt of court for allegedly giving false testimony at a July, 2004 judgment debtor ...

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Lomaz

{¶ 2} The trial docket before this court shows that the underlying civil action has been pending since July 1998, when appellee filed a creditor's bill against appellant. In its complaint, appellee asserted that it had not been able to collect on a judgment lien that it had obtained ...

CUMMINS PROPERTY v. FRANKLIN CTY.

... Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 NE2d 782, when it considered and rejected various arguments against using a recent, arm's-length sale price to determine the value of property for taxation purposes. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.