Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involoves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.


By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.

Seattle DUI-DWI Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm


Daniel  Smith Lawyer

Daniel Smith

VERIFIED
Immigration, Bankruptcy & Debt, Wills & Probate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI
Boutique law firm offering diligent, affordable representation.

Daniel graduated magna cum laude from West Chester University of Pennsylvania where he received a degree in Political Science. He then attended Seattl... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-916-2901

Wilberforce  Agyekum Lawyer

Wilberforce Agyekum

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy & Debt, Civil & Human Rights, Accident & Injury
Dedicated to Providing Quality Representation

We’re committed to providing you with top notch legal support. We approach every client with a focus on integrity, advocacy, and understanding. We f... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-311-1331

Erik P. Kaeding Lawyer

Erik P. Kaeding

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor

Criminal Defense Built Around You Working Hard to Protect Your Rights At the Kent, Washington, Law Office of Erik P. Kaeding we help people find an... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-768-0491

Cristine  Beckwith Lawyer

Cristine Beckwith

VERIFIED
DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Juvenile Law
Criminal Defense

Cristine Beckwith is the owner of Beckwith Law. She is exceptionally qualified to provide strong representation to clients facing a wide range of crim... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-971-6401

Speak with Lawyer.com
Jordan K. Foster Lawyer

Jordan K. Foster

VERIFIED
DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Real Estate Other

I have over 11 years experience as a practicing attorney. I have been voted a Rising Star in Criminal Defense and DUI Defense by Washington Super Lawy... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-728-0831

Brian  Ashbach Lawyer

Brian Ashbach

VERIFIED
DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect

Brian graduated with highest honors (summa cum laude) from Seattle University Law where he was a member of Law Review and winner of multiple awards, a... (more)

Kris R. Jensen

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Trademark
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Peter J. Peaquin

DUI-DWI
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

James E. Sedney

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Traffic, White Collar Crime
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Kevin R. Cole

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Juvenile Law
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.


Display Sponsorship

TIPS

Easily find Seattle DUI-DWI Lawyers and Seattle DUI-DWI Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act, White Collar Crime and Traffic attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)
The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)
A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)
Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)
A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)
(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)
A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)
The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)
The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chambers

... Deborah A. Dwyer, King Co. Pros. Ofc./Appellate Unit, Seattle, WA, for Respondent. SCHINDLER, J. ¶ 1 Under former RCW 46.61.502(6)(2007), the crime of driving while under the influence (DUI) is elevated from a gross ... We affirm the jury's conviction of felony DUI. FACTS. ...

State v. Eaton

... Michael C. Kinnie, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent. BRIDGEWATER, PJ. ¶ 1 A jury convicted Thomas Eaton of one count of driving while under the influence (DUI) and one count of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine. ...

State v. Eaton

... CHAMBERS, J. ¶ 1 Thomas Eaton was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) and taken by police to the Clark County Jail. ... After performing field sobriety tests Officer Starks concluded that Eaton was impaired and arrested him for DUI. ...