Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary
disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing
so has expired. ... CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, concur.
Worker claims that it is wrong to assume that he permanently removed himself "from the labor
market." [MIO 2] He contends that, where there is a preponderance of evidence that he intended
to continue to work, the WCJ could not find that he voluntarily removed himself from the ...
201 P.3d 855 (2008). 2008-NMCERT-010. TRANSPORTATION v. S & S TREZZA. No. 31.318
(COA 28,475). Supreme Court of New Mexico. October 1, 2008. Writ Granted.