Abilene Felony Lawyer, Texas, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephanie Alvarado
About | Practice Areas
Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
100 N Central Expy Suite 805 Richardson, TX 75080» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fighting Against Unjust Prosecution

Attorney Stephanie Alvarado is there for her clients when help is needed right away. Helping people charged with crimes in Texas for over 20 years.

800-988-5471
1. Stephanie Alvarado Richardson, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1996
  Baylor University J.D. 1996
2. AboutStephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
  Over 20 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Abilene Felony lawyer.
Below are all Abilene Criminal lawyers.

Samuel Jacob Carroll

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

300 Oak St, Abilene, TX 79602

Samuel Dellis Darnall

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

3444 N 1St St, Abilene, TX 79603

Dennis Jay Von Willer

Personal Injury, Business & Trade, Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

2801 S Treadaway Blvd, Abilene, TX 79602

Dexter M. Patterson

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

902 Radford Rd, Abilene, TX 79601

Gary Elbert Connally

Personal Injury, Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

8210 Linda Vista, Abilene, TX 79606

John Robert Saringer

Litigation, Family Law, Criminal, Wills, Adoption

Status:

CONTACT

290 Cedar, Abilene, TX 79601

Larry Dee Robertson

Criminal, Employee Rights

Status: Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

Abilene, TX 79604

Charles E. Rice

Elder Law, Criminal, Wills, State Appellate Practice

Status: Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Abilene, TX 79604

Danna Elizabeth Lambert Wolfe

Criminal, Juvenile Law, Wills, DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

Abilene, TX 79604

Christine Paige Rankin

Criminal, Family Law, Other, Juvenile Law

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

3610 Vine St, Abilene, TX 79602

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bigon v. State

... In two separate indictments, [1] Appellant was indicted for the following offenses: two counts of felony murder, with the underlying felony of driving while intoxicated with a passenger under 15 years of age; two counts of intoxication manslaughter; and two counts of manslaughter ...

Littrell v. State

... In a single jury trial, the appellant was tried and convicted, and his punishment was assessed, for both the offense of felony murder and the offense of aggravated robbery. ... First we must determine whether the aggravated robbery is a lesser-included offense of the felony murder. ...

Kirkpatrick v. State

... After the state had presented its case-in-chief, appellant moved for an instructed verdict on the felony forgery count, asserting that the state had failed to prove felony forgery because it had not alleged or proven any of the elements necessary to make the forgery a felony rather ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Abilene Felony Lawyer, Texas, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Samuel Jacob Carroll

Samuel Dellis Darnall

Dennis Jay Von Willer

Dexter M. Patterson

Gary Elbert Connally

John Robert Saringer

Larry Dee Robertson

Charles E. Rice

Danna Elizabeth Lambert Wolfe

Christine Paige Rankin

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTENTIONAL TORT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

HOMICIDE

NOLO CONTENDERE

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

CORPUS DELECTI

DIRECTED VERDICT

GRAND JURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bigon v. State

Littrell v. State

Kirkpatrick v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS