Belmont Misdemeanor Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Sean Logue
Google+ | Contact Us
Sean Logue & Associates
200 First Avenue 3rd Floor #301A Pittsburgh, PA 15222 » view map
DUI, Sex Crimes, Drug Crimes, Expungements
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Our lawyers bring a thorough understanding of criminal issues to help minimize the damage that a DUI charge can bring to our clients.

412-389-0805
1. Sean Logue Pittsburgh, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2008
  West Virginia, J.D. - 2007
2. Google+
  Visit us and follow on Google+ to interact on social media.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Free initial consultation. Contact us today.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Belmont Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Belmont Criminal lawyers.

Daniel Joseph Guinn

Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

New Philadelphia, OH 44663

Steven Anthony Stickles

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

500 Market St, Steubenville, OH 43952

Lacee Kae Felix

Municipal, State and Local, Misdemeanor, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

New Philadelphia, OH 44663

Ronald L Pritts

Misdemeanor, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

117 S Hollywood Blvd, Steubenville, OH 43952

Trevor Edward Bigler

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

109 E Church St, Barnesville, OH 43713

Donald Ralph Burns

Other, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

8116 Deer Rd. Sw, BOWERSTON, OH 44695

Bonnie Stewart

Trusts, Family Law, Employee Rights, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

320 Howard St, Bridgeport, OH 43912

Geoffrey Bird Mosser

Juvenile Law, Real Estate, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

232 S Main St, Cadiz, OH 43907

Matthew Paul Puskarich

Government, Environmental Law Other, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

100 W Market St, Cadiz, OH 43907

Rupert Nelms Beetham

Real Estate, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Estate

Status: Inactive Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

Cadiz, OH 43907

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Futrall

... Facts. {Â¶ 2} In May 2001, defendant-appellant, Douglas Futrall, was indicted on five criminal offenses: (1) aggravated menacing in violation of RC 2903.21(A), a first-degree misdemeanor, (2) improper handling of firearms in violation of RC 2923.16(B), a first-degree misdemeanor ...

Cleveland Hts. v. Lewis

... {Â¶ 1} The Eighth District Court of Appeals certified that a conflict exists between its decision in this case and decisions of the Second and Seventh District Courts of Appeals on the following question: "Whether an appeal is rendered moot when a misdemeanor defendant serves ...

State v. Downie

... The right to counsel extends to misdemeanor criminal cases that could result in the imposition of a jail sentence. ... {Â¶ 21} Appellant was charged with misdemeanor offenses, which are the type of petty offenses referred to in Crim.R. 44. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Belmont Misdemeanor Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Sean Logue & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Daniel Joseph Guinn

Steven Anthony Stickles

Lacee Kae Felix

Ronald L Pritts

Trevor Edward Bigler

Donald Ralph Burns

Bonnie Stewart

Geoffrey Bird Mosser

Matthew Paul Puskarich

Rupert Nelms Beetham

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

PROSECUTE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

ARREST

LINEUP

CONTINGENCY FEE

GRAND JURY

JURY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Futrall

Cleveland Hts. v. Lewis

State v. Downie

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS