Brooks Criminal Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jule McReynolds
About | Practice Areas
The McReynolds Law Firm, PC
3799 Main Street #87012 College Park, GA 30337» view map
Criminal Defense
Defending Your Rights

Let The McReynolds Law Firm, PC handle all your criminal defense needs.

800-919-4121
1. Jule McReynolds College Park, GA
  Attorney at Law, GA
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D.
2. AboutThe McReynolds Law Firm, PC
  Defending Your Rights
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

J. Michael Upton

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Employment, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

115 Lake Horton Landing Drive, Fayetteville, GA 30215

George Harold Weldon

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

2172 Garner Road, Gay, GA 30218

Edea M. Caldwell

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

7939 Mt Carmel Rd, Gay, GA 30218

Michael Garett Deleva

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

Hampton, GA 30228

Selwin Eton Patterson

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

Hampton, GA 30228

Walker L. Chandler

Federal Trial Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

101 Gleneagle Point, Peachtree City, GA 30269

Natalie Ashman

Traffic, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Real Estate, Immigration

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

401 Westpark Court, Peachtree City, GA 30269

Lloyd William Walker

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

119 Shadowood Lane, Peachtree City, GA 30269

Joseph Myers

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Peachtree City, GA 30269

Skyler Alexander Taylor

Entertainment, Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Peachtree City, GA 30269

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ruffin v. State

... [3] Thus, the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy . . . trial." [4] The Civil War Amendments made the Sixth Amendment speedy trial right enforceable in state criminal prosecutions. ...

Rodriguez v. State

... The indictment charged that both Appellants "did participate in criminal street gang activity by committing a crime of violence, to wit: aggravated assault while associated with a criminal street gang. . . ." A separate count charged ...

English v. State

... Atty., for Appellee. PHIPPS, Judge. Following a jury trial, Jason English was convicted of, among other offenses, criminal attempt to commit aggravated sodomy. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the criminal attempt conviction. We disagree and affirm. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Brooks Criminal Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

The McReynolds Law Firm, PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

J. Michael Upton

George Harold Weldon

Edea M. Caldwell

Michael Garett Deleva

Selwin Eton Patterson

Walker L. Chandler

Natalie Ashman

Lloyd William Walker

Joseph Myers

Skyler Alexander Taylor

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CHARGE

HOT PURSUIT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

GRAND JURY

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

HABEAS CORPUS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

DIRECTED VERDICT

ACTUS REUS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ruffin v. State

Rodriguez v. State

English v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS