Cobb Island Contract Lawyer, Maryland, page 2

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Connie Jean Louis

Employee Rights, Contract, Business
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  15 Years

Elizabeth Mackay

Contract, Prenuptial Agreements, Litigation, Insurance
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  37 Years

Elsa Waite Smith

Contract, Household Mold, Civil Rights, Divorce
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Cobb Island Contract Lawyers and Cobb Island Contract Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Antitrust, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Nova v. Penske

... (Nova). The question presented in this appeal is whether the contract provision for indemnification includes first party attorney's fees, where the contract language does not provide expressly for the recovery of attorney's fees. ...

Clancy v. King

... 355, 936 A.2d 852 (2007), to consider three questions: 1. Whether the lower courts erred in failing to recognize that principles of contract preempt fiduciary duties where the contract is unambiguous and the parties have made their intentions clear? ...

Janusz v. Gilliam

... The trial court found no basis for either rescinding the contract, or finding that Mr. Gilliam had been unjustly enriched. Ms. Janusz appealed to the Court of Special Appeals and, before the intermediate appellate court decided the appeal, we granted certiorari. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.