Codington County, SD DUI-DWI Lawyers, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Sean Flaherty
About | Practice Areas
Keches Law Group
122 Dean Street Taunton, MA 02780» view map
Social Security, Personal Injury, Workers Comp.
Protecting Your Rights

Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys has over 130 years of combined experience representing individuals and families injured due to the negligence of others.

800-713-8650
1. Sean Flaherty Taunton, MA
  Attorney at Law - MA, 2006
  New England School of Law J.D.
2. AboutKeches Law Group
  We are attorneys that care.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Social Security
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Codington DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Codington lawyers.

Raymond D. Rylance

Commercial Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

Ronald K. Roehr

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Codington County Courthouse, 14 1st Ave. SE, Watertown, SD 57201

Scott R. Bratland

Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

15 1st Avenue SE, Watertown, SD 57201

Nancy L. Oviatt

Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice, Civil Rights, Commercial Real Estate

Status:

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

Adam C. Reeves

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

108 7th St. SE, Watertown, SD 57201

Nancy J. Turbak Berry

Landlord-Tenant, Motor Vehicle, Health Care Other, Wills & Probate

Status:

CONTACT

26 S Broadway, Watertown, SD 57201

John L. Foley

Commercial Real Estate, Family Law, Business & Trade

Status:

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

Rebecca Morlock Reeves

Divorce & Family Law

Status:

CONTACT

Watertown, SD 57201

David R. Strait

Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Business, Wills & Probate

Status:

CONTACT

25 First Avenue Southwest, Watertown, SD 57201

Lisa Losano Carrico

Estate, Business, Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Adoption

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

657 W. Kemp Ave, Watertown, SD 57201

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Codington County, SD DUI-DWI Lawyers, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

Keches Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Raymond D. Rylance

Ronald K. Roehr

Scott R. Bratland

Nancy L. Oviatt

Adam C. Reeves

Nancy J. Turbak Berry

John L. Foley

Rebecca Morlock Reeves

David R. Strait

Lisa Losano Carrico

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

BURDEN OF PROOF

SPECIFIC INTENT

CRIME

MOTION IN LIMINE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

INTERROGATION

INFORMED CONSENT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 70