Goodland DUI-DWI Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael M. Raheb
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Michael M. Raheb P.A.
2423 First St Fort Myers, FL 33901» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Legal Problem? Call Us 24/7

At the Law Office of Michael M. Raheb, we strive to ensure each of our clients receives the individual attention and representation necessary to obtain an optimal outcome.

800-890-8981
1. Michael M. Raheb Fort Myers, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 1998
  Nova Southeastern University J.D.
2. AboutLaw Offices of Michael M. Raheb P.A.
  We'll Guide You Through Your Case
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Landon Miller

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime

Landon Miller has been practicing as a criminal defense attorney in Naples and Ft Myers for 18 years. His previous cases include but not limited to mu... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-851-6510

2335 Stanford Court, Naples, FL 34112

James W. Chandler

Traffic, Family Law, Child Support, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

2671 Airport Rd S, Naples, FL 34112

John Patrick Musca

Domestic Violence & Neglect, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2800 Davis Blvd, Naples, FL 34104

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kelly

... Hlad 1033 held that the State may not use a criminal defendant's prior uncounseled [2] misdemeanor driving-under-the-influence ("DUI") convictions to increase a subsequent DUI charge from a misdemeanor to a felony, where the prior uncounseled misdemeanors led to actual ...

Thompson v. State

... TAYLOR, J. James Thompson petitions this court for a writ of prohibition to prevent his further prosecution for felony driving under the influence (DUI). ... On July 30, 2007, the petitioner was arrested for felony DUI. The felony charge was filed in Case Number 07-14097CF10A. ...

Hutto v. State

... Appellant claims that he is entitled to postconviction relief because his prior convictions for driving under the influence were uncounseled and thus improperly used to enhance the present DUI charge. He makes four claims based ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Goodland DUI-DWI Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Michael M. Raheb P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Landon Miller

James W. Chandler

John Patrick Musca

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CHARGE

SPECIFIC INTENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

MISTRIAL

IMPRISON

ARRAIGNMENT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kelly

Thompson v. State

Hutto v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details