Green Valley Juvenile Law Lawyer, Arizona, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Randi E Alexander

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

Randi E Alexander

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

Marie D Kagie-Shutey

Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

David P Braun

Litigation, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

David P Braun

Litigation, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

Lorena A Jaquet

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

Helena Seymour

Juvenile Law, Consumer Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

Cathleen Elizabeth Fuller

Juvenile Law, Other, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

Dawn Rachelle Williams

Juvenile Law, Other, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

Cathleen Elizabeth Fuller

Juvenile Law, Other, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

4211 S Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85714

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

DENISE R. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC.

... OPINION. ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge. Â¶ 1 After Denise R. failed to appear for a December 2008 initial termination hearing, the juvenile court terminated her parental rights to her eleven-year-old son, Draven, and her six-year-old daughter, Larsen, based on findings that ...

In re Nickolas T.

... ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge. Â¶ 1 In this appeal, the State of Arizona challenges the juvenile court's order vacating its prior order that had required appellee Nickolas T. to register as a sex offender in connection with his 2003 delinquency adjudication for sexual assault. ...

In re Michelle G.

... 1 Michelle G. appeals from the juvenile court's January 2007 order that she pay restitution to the victim of criminal damage she had committed in 2004. She contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by ordering restitution after her disposition had become final. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Green Valley Juvenile Law Lawyer, Arizona, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Randi E Alexander

Randi E Alexander

Marie D Kagie-Shutey

David P Braun

David P Braun

Lorena A Jaquet

Helena Seymour

Cathleen Elizabeth Fuller

Dawn Rachelle Williams

Cathleen Elizabeth Fuller

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

MISDEMEANOR

CRIMINAL LAW

BURDEN OF PROOF

EAVESDROPPING

PLEA

PROBABLE CAUSE

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

DENISE R. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC.

In re Nickolas T.

In re Michelle G.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS