Houlton Criminal Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard Morris
About | Practice Areas
Morris Law Group PA
7380 France Ave S. Suite 250 Edina, MN 55435» view map
Criminal Defense Law
We Are Experts In What We Do

Whether it’s your home or business, you are important to us. Reach out today to set up a meeting with one of our experienced Edina lawyers.

800-872-9610
1. Richard Morris Edina, MN
  Attorney at Law- MN, 1974
  William Mitchell College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutMorris Law Group PA
  We Are Experts In What We Do
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

R. Michael Waterman

Construction, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Joel D. Schlitz

Criminal, Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Terrence M. Gherty

Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: Deceased Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

328 Vine St, Hudson, WI 54016

Mark J. Gherty

Wrongful Termination, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

328 Vine Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Daniel F. DeMaio

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

808 Carmichael Rd, Hudson, WI 54016

Barbara K. Miller

Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

615 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Sarah Diane Slice

Litigation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

808 Carmichael Rd, Hudson, WI 54016

James R. Bartholomew

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

220 Locust St, Hudson, WI 54016

Christopher Stephen Petros

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Litigation, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

431 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Jonathan B. Lundeen

Landlord-Tenant, Employment, Criminal, Civil Rights, Banking & Finance

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 2Nd St, Hudson, WI 54016

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kramer

... Id. Â¶ 11 A primary question the court of appeals addressed was whether evidence of Wagner's subjective belief that criminal activity might be taking place operated to preclude his conduct from coming within the scope of his community caretaker function. Id., Â¶ 13. ...

State v. Harris

... I. Did the State violate Wis. Stat. Â§ 971.23(1) (the criminal discovery statute) or the ... Stat. Â§ 971.23(1) (the criminal discovery statute) by failing to disclose timely the defendant's request to put on a particular pair of pants? If so, was the defendant prejudiced by the violation? III. ...

State v. Schaefer

... 2 After permitting Schaefer's interlocutory appeal, the court of appeals certified the following question to this court: "Does a criminal defendant have a subpoena right to obtain and copy police investigation reports and nonprivileged materials prior to the preliminary hearing ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Houlton Criminal Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Morris Law Group PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

R. Michael Waterman

Joel D. Schlitz

Terrence M. Gherty

Mark J. Gherty

Daniel F. DeMaio

Barbara K. Miller

Sarah Diane Slice

James R. Bartholomew

Christopher Stephen Petros

Jonathan B. Lundeen

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

IMPEACH

FEDERAL COURT

ASSAULT

MOTION IN LIMINE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

INTENTIONAL TORT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kramer

State v. Harris

State v. Schaefer

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS