Kenmare Criminal Lawyer, North Dakota

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Larson
About | Practice Areas
Larson Latham Huettl, LLP
1100 College Drive Bismarck, ND 58502Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Over 35 Years Experience.

You need an attorney with accident & injury knowledge who will vigorously protect your rights and interests.

800-953-1581
1. Gregory Larson Bismarck, ND
  Attorney at Law - ND, 1980
  Gonzaga University J.D. 1978
2. AboutLarson Latham Huettl, LLP
  Over 35 Years Experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Kenmare Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Kenmare lawyers.

James G. Wolff

Military & Veterans Appeals, Agriculture, Criminal, Corporate

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

105 W. Main, Mohall, ND 58761

Amber Joy Fiesel

Real Estate Other, Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, Immigration

Status: Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

404 Railroad Ave E, Powers Lake, ND 58773

Anne Catherine Weddle

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Carpio, ND 58725

Christopher Dale Porter

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

961 Myrtle Street, Lansford, ND 58750

Jennifer Carol Manson

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

5975 84Th Ave. N.W., Stanley, ND 58784

John S. Steinberger

Government

Status: Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

206 N. Central, Kenmare, ND 58746

Mark Russell Hays

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

1911 76Th Street N.W., Burlington, ND 58722

Marshall D. Hogue

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

6811 27Th Ave, Minot, ND 58703

Marvin K. Madsen

Industry Specialties, Government, Estate, Divorce & Family Law

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

105 First Ave NE, Mohall, ND 58761

Quentin R Schulte

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 83 Years

CONTACT

18 Railroad Avenue, Stanley, ND 58784

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re GRH

... personality disorder and the sexual perversion of sexual attraction to adolescents, supported by GRH's reoffending on several other adolescent females after his gross sexual imposition conviction, separates 724 GRH from the ordinary recidivist convicted in criminal cases and ...

Sauby v. City of Fargo

... 06? [Â¶2] Because we conclude NDCC Â§ 12.1-01-05 clearly and unambiguously precludes a home rule city from superseding criminal or noncriminal offenses defined by state law, we answer the certified question "no.". I. [Â¶3] The ...

State v. Alvarado

... KAPSNER, Justice. [Â¶1] Abraham Alvarado appeals from a criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict finding him guilty of felonious restraint. ... 404(b) issue, because the evidence was of activity in furtherance of the present charge of criminal activity. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Kenmare Criminal Lawyer, North Dakota

Sponsored Law Firm

Larson Latham Huettl, LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James G. Wolff

Amber Joy Fiesel

Anne Catherine Weddle

Christopher Dale Porter

Jennifer Carol Manson

John S. Steinberger

Mark Russell Hays

Marshall D. Hogue

Marvin K. Madsen

Quentin R Schulte

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

ACQUITTAL

ASSAULT

JURY NULLIFICATION

EAVESDROPPING

SEARCH WARRANT

GRAND JURY

CRIMINAL LAW

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re GRH

Sauby v. City of Fargo

State v. Alvarado

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS