Lewiston DUI-DWI Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Smith
About | Practice Areas
Greg Smith and Associates
7324 Union Park Ave Suite 101 Midvale, UT 84047Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Proudly Serving The State of Utah

We've successfully resolved thousands of criminal defense and other cases, and we can take your call now!

800-925-8751
1. Gregory Smith Midvale, UT
  Attorney at Law - UT, 1993
  Brigham Young University J.D. 1993
2. AboutGreg Smith and Associates
  Over 25 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Lewiston DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Lewiston Criminal lawyers.

Brian John Craig

Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Criminal, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

95 West 100 South, Logan, UT 84321

Jonathan P Thomas

Criminal, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

135 North Main Street, Logan, UT 84321

Shannon R Demler

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

399 N. Main St., Logan, UT 84321

Tess A. Davis

Divorce & Family Law, Litigation, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

265 N 100 W, Logan, UT 84321

Bryan P Galloway

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

399 N Main St, Logan, UT 84321

Jacob A Watterson

DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

130 South Main Street, Logan, UT 84321

Rand Henderson

Criminal, Government, Bankruptcy, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

Logan, UT 84323

Angela F Fonnesbeck

Other, Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

135 North 100 West, Logan, UT 84321

Bret R James

Other, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

750 South Gateway Drive, Logan, UT 84321

Brian John Craig

Estate Planning, Employee Rights, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

95 W 100 S St, Logan, UT 84321

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Palmer

... DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice: INTRODUCTION. Â¶ 1 Robert Palmer contends that the court of appeals erred in upholding his third-degree felony conviction under Utah's driving under the influence (DUI) recidivism enhancement statute. ... [2] Id. ("A [DUI] conviction ... ...

State v. Palmer

... McHUGH, Judge: Â¶ 1 Robert Palmer challenges his conviction under subsection (2)(a) of Utah Code section 41-6-44, which makes it unlawful to operate a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or any drug (DUI). ... Accordingly, we affirm Palmer's felony DUI conviction. ...

Orem City v. Longoria

... MEMORANDUM DECISION. BENCH, Judge: Â¶1 Defendant Jaime M. Longoria appeals his convictions for driving under the influence (DUI) and reckless driving, both class B misdemeanors. ... The jury again convicted Defendant of DUI and reckless driving, and he now appeals. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Lewiston DUI-DWI Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Greg Smith and Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brian John Craig

Jonathan P Thomas

Shannon R Demler

Tess A. Davis

Bryan P Galloway

Jacob A Watterson

Rand Henderson

Angela F Fonnesbeck

Bret R James

Brian John Craig

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

NOLLE PROSEQUI

PROSECUTE

DIRECTED VERDICT

SELF-DEFENSE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

BATTERY

LINEUP

CAPITAL CASE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Palmer

State v. Palmer

Orem City v. Longoria

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS