CALL 800-620-0900 TODAY!

X

OR FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW:

Enter case details below and connect to a lawyer fast!

Briefly describe your case:

Lawyer.Com Uses AI Matching For Strongest Results!

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

FOR LEGAL PROFESSIONALS

Manitou Beach Felony Lawyer, Michigan, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Tricia Terry
About | Articles
Marrs & Terry, PLLC
6553 Jackson Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103Â» view map
Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal Defense, Estate
Personalized, Efficient Counsel

Marrs & Terry, PLLC have been helping individuals face a variety of legal challenges, including bankruptcy, estate planning and administration, and family law.

800-862-7221
1. Tricia Terry Ann Arbor, MI
  Attorney at Law- MI, 1999
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D.
2. AboutExperienced Michigan Lawyer
  For more information about Tricia Terry
3. Articles
  Click here to read some legal arcticles published by Tricia Terry
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Manitou Beach Felony lawyer.
Below are all Manitou Beach Criminal lawyers.

Rodney James Leon

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

506 W Maumee St, Adrian, MI 49221

William Harold Walker

Divorce, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Corporate

Status:

160 North Winter Street, Adrian, MI 49221

James W. Daly

Real Estate, Lawsuit, Social Security, Divorce, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 50 Years

227 N Winter St, Adrian, MI 49221

Nancy R. Eaton

Estate, Power of Attorney, Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice, Divorce & Family Law

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

160 N Winter St, Adrian, MI 49221

Tamaris L. Henagan

Government, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 8 Years

160 N Winter St, Adrian, MI 49221

Todd Michael Morgan

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Divorce, Criminal

Status:

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Michael M. Mcfarland

Other, Traffic, Family Law, Criminal

Status:

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Michael Hagop Dagher-margosian

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Rhonda K. Underwood

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 38 Years

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Dawn R. Vandusen

Government, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

113 W Front St, Adrian, MI 49221

Member Representative

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

... Opinion. MARKMAN, J. At issue here is whether convicting and sentencing a defendant for both first-degree felony murder and the predicate felony 538 violates the "multiple punishments" strand of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. ...

People v. Gardner

... This Court has ruled that the statutes imply that each predicate felony must arise from separate criminal incidents. ... Therefore, multiple felonies that arise from the same criminal incident or transaction count as a single felony under the habitual offender laws. ...

People v. Idziak

... In this case, we consider whether a parolee who is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a felony committed while on parole is entitled, under Michigan's jail credit statute, MCL 769.11b, to credit for time served in jail after his arrest on the new offense and ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.