Powhatan Criminal Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Eric Johnson
About | Practice Areas
John D & Eric G Johnson Law Firm, LLC
415 Main St Minden, LA 71055» view map
Criminal Defense and Accident & Injury
Fighting for You When You Need It the Most

At the John D. & Eric G. Johnson Law Firm, LLC, attorney Eric Johnson is renowned for his handling of cases throughout Minden and north Louisiana.

800-768-5820
1. Eric Johnson Minden, LA
  Attorney at Law- LA, 1989
2. AboutJohn D & Eric G Johnson Law Firm, LLC
  Fighting for You When You Need It the Most
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

J. Dhu Thompson

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce, Child Custody, Family Law

Dhu Thompson is a criminal defense, family law, and catastrophic injury lawyer in Louisiana. After graduating from Southern University Law School in 2... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-970-3561

7607 Fern Avenue, Shreveport, LA 71105

Keenan Kirk Kelly

Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

137 Saint Denis St, Natchitoches, LA 71457

William G Nader

Civil & Human Rights, Criminal, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

1953 E 70Th St, Shreveport, LA 71105

Leo Joseph Flynn

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Employment, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

2820 Jackson St, Alexandria, LA 71301

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ates

... LOLLEY, J. This criminal appeal arises from the Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union, State of Louisiana. Edward Eugene Ates, Jr. ... The offense of illegal use of a weapon requires proof of either general intent or criminal negligence. State v. Walker, 26,026 (La.App. ...

State v. Ates

8 So.3d 581 (2009). STATE of Louisiana v. Edward Eugene ATES, Jr. No. 2008-KO-2341. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 15, 2009. Denied.

State v. Jones

... 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Under the Jackson standard, a review of a criminal conviction record for sufficiency of evidence does not require the court to ask whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Powhatan Criminal Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

John D & Eric G Johnson Law Firm, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

J. Dhu Thompson

Keenan Kirk Kelly

William G Nader

Leo Joseph Flynn

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

HOT PURSUIT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

CONVICTION

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CORPUS DELECTI

WARRANT

BURDEN OF PROOF

DIRECTED VERDICT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ates

State v. Ates

State v. Jones

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS