Richardton Criminal Lawyer, North Dakota, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Larson
About | Practice Areas
Larson Latham Huettl, LLP
1100 College Drive Bismarck, ND 58502Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Over 35 Years Experience.

You need an attorney with accident & injury knowledge who will vigorously protect your rights and interests.

800-953-1581
1. Gregory Larson Bismarck, ND
  Attorney at Law - ND, 1980
  Gonzaga University J.D. 1978
2. AboutLarson Latham Huettl, LLP
  Over 35 Years Experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Richardton Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Richardton lawyers.

Ashley Holmes Hurlbert

Criminal, Traffic, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

513 Elks Drive, Dickinson, ND 58601

Sandra K. Kuntz

Litigation, Government, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

536 West Villard Street, Dickinson, ND 58601

Markus A. Powell

Landlord-Tenant, Employment Contracts, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

513 Elks Drive, Dickinson, ND 58601

Kelly Michael Armstrong

Divorce, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Business & Trade

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

513 Elks Dr, Dickinson, ND 58601

Jordan Lee Selinger

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce, Business, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

117 1St Street East, Dickinson, ND 58601

Jon Bogner

Landlord-Tenant, Real Estate, Industry Specialties

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

117 First St E, Dickinson, ND 58602

Bruce A. Selinger

Real Estate, Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

117 First St E, Dickinson, ND 58602

David J. Ridl

Real Estate, Environmental Law, Child Custody, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

117 First St E, Dickinson, ND 58602

Dann Edward Greenwood

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

51 Third St E, Dickinson, ND 58601

William Anton Herauf

Other, Government, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

51 Third St E, Dickinson, ND 58601

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re GRH

... personality disorder and the sexual perversion of sexual attraction to adolescents, supported by GRH's reoffending on several other adolescent females after his gross sexual imposition conviction, separates 724 GRH from the ordinary recidivist convicted in criminal cases and ...

Sauby v. City of Fargo

... 06? [Â¶2] Because we conclude NDCC Â§ 12.1-01-05 clearly and unambiguously precludes a home rule city from superseding criminal or noncriminal offenses defined by state law, we answer the certified question "no.". I. [Â¶3] The ...

State v. Alvarado

... KAPSNER, Justice. [Â¶1] Abraham Alvarado appeals from a criminal judgment entered following a jury verdict finding him guilty of felonious restraint. ... 404(b) issue, because the evidence was of activity in furtherance of the present charge of criminal activity. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Richardton Criminal Lawyer, North Dakota, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Larson Latham Huettl, LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ashley Holmes Hurlbert

Sandra K. Kuntz

Markus A. Powell

Kelly Michael Armstrong

Jordan Lee Selinger

Jon Bogner

Bruce A. Selinger

David J. Ridl

Dann Edward Greenwood

William Anton Herauf

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

SEARCH WARRANT

BURDEN OF PROOF

DIRECTED VERDICT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

WARRANT

ACTUS REUS

CRIMINAL INSANITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re GRH

Sauby v. City of Fargo

State v. Alvarado

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS