Santa Ana Misdemeanor Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Vincent Davis
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
150 N. Santa Anita Ave, Suite 200 Arcadia, CA 91006» view map
Criminal Defense, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor
Advocating On Your Behalf

If you are seeking an experienced criminal defense attorney to represent you, count on the Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis.

626-446-6442
1. Vincent Davis Arcadia, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1986
  Loyola Marymount, J.D., 1986
2. AboutLaw Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
  Over 20 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Juvenile Dependency Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Paula Drake

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime

It is our goal to provide a vigorous, individualized defense
for our clients.

Bad things really do happen to good people. If you find yourself, a friend, or a family member being accused of a crime or under investigation - time ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

844-529-3649

17621 Irvine Blvd, Tustin, CA 92780

Karren Kenney

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, Felony, Misdemeanor

Karren Kenney was a Deputy Public Defender for almost 12 years where she became one of the best Orange County criminal defense attorneys, defending ev... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-735-6750

575 Anton Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Robert Louis Miller

✓ VERIFIED

DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Administrative Law, Pharmaceutical Product, Business Organization

An Orange County DUI Attorney with his own firm, Roberthas handled thousands of cases in 23 yrs.

Robert Miller is one of the most highly rated attorneys in California. His vast experience, zealous advocacy for his clients and extensive knowledge o... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-742-0730

5020 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660

Peter Francis Iocona

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, Misdemeanor

Rated by "Super Lawyers" - Orange County's "Best" or "Top-Rated" DUI Defense Firm

Rated by Super Lawyers, Peter F. Iocona - Attorney at Law, and his partners, Alan Castillo and Marlo Cordero, formed "The SoCal Law Network" and selec... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-976-6931

23152 Verdugo Drive, Laguna Hills, CA 92653

Jana Santiago

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 5 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

700 Civic Center Drive, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Creighton B. Laz

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

5160 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660

Matthew Blake Wallin

Criminal, Felony, Education, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

17592 Irvine Blvd, Tustin, CA 92780

Donald G. Sowers

DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

7545 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618

Alisha C Frank

Lawsuit, Divorce & Family Law, Misdemeanor, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 7 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

160 S. Old Springs Rd., Anaheim, CA 92808

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.

Display Sponsorship

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Feyrer

... Defendant Jesse Feyrer was charged with assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, an offense punishable either as a felony or a misdemeanorâ€”commonly known as a "wobbler." It also was alleged defendant personally inflicted great bodily injury upon the ...

People v. Mauch

... Code, Â§ 11358) to a misdemeanor. We agree the trial court lacked authority to reduce the offense from a felony to a misdemeanor, and we therefore vacate defendant's plea and direct the trial court to reinstate the charge as a felony. 673 I. ...

People v. Garcia

... (b).) Involuntary manslaughter based on "an unlawful act, not amounting to felony"â€”a killing resulting from the commission of a misdemeanorâ€”requires proof not only that the defendant acted with general criminal intent but also that the predicate misdemeanor was dangerous ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Santa Ana Misdemeanor Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Paula Drake

Karren Kenney

Robert Louis Miller

Peter Francis Iocona

Jana Santiago

Creighton B. Laz

Matthew Blake Wallin

Donald G. Sowers

Alisha C Frank

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CONTINGENCY FEE

HOT PURSUIT

IMPEACH

NOLO CONTENDERE

ACCOMPLICE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Feyrer

People v. Mauch

People v. Garcia

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details