Scappoose DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jennie Clark
About | Practice Areas
Clark Law & Associates LLC
6501 SW Macadam Ave Suite E Portland, OR 97239» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Best Representation Possible

The advantage of having five attorneys and legal assistants is that we regularly confer with each other, so you receive the best representation possible.

800-722-8790
1. Jennie Clark Portland, OR
  Attorney at Law - OR, 2000
  University of California J.D. 1997
2. AboutClark Law & Associates LLC
  Best Representation Possible
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Kathy Proctor

Divorce & Family Law, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

17933 NW Evergreen Pl, Beaverton, OR 97006

Richard E Oberdorfer

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4080 N Williams Ave, Happy Valley, OR 97227

Sandi Pellikaan

White Collar Crime, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2256 N Albina, Happy Valley, OR 97227

Andy Simrin

Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

405 NW 18th Ave, Portland, OR 97209

Steven John Sherlag

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

820 Nw 12Th Ave, Portland, OR 97209

Russell S Barnett

White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

917 SW Oak St, Portland, OR 97205

Amy Margolis

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

19 N.W. 5Th Avenue, Portland, OR 97209

Garrett Mattson

DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

1020 Sw Taylor St, Portland, OR 97205

Gabriel Biello

DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

111 Sw 5Th Ave, Portland, OR 97204

Alan W Karpinski

Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

621 SW Alder St, Happy Valley, OR 97205

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

184 P.3d 1182 (2008). 220 Or. App. 38. STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay Lynn KRUSE, Defendant-Appellant. D055973M, D060612T, A132038 (Control), A132039. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted January 4, 2008. Decided May 14, 2008. ...

State v. Machuca

227 P.3d 729 (2010). 347 Or. 644. STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Thomas Gregory MACHUCA, Respondent on Review. (CC 050647097; CA A133362; SC S057910). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted December 16, 2009. ...

Prior v. Department of Revenue

... [2]. In her Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Department is in error in withholding the tax refund to pay for her "husband's DUI[,] [because] I have be[en] separated from him for 6 y[ea]rs and have nothing to do with his affairs or finances." [3] (Ptf's Compl at 1, Sec. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Scappoose DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Clark Law & Associates LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kathy Proctor

Richard E Oberdorfer

Sandi Pellikaan

Andy Simrin

Steven John Sherlag

Russell S Barnett

Amy Margolis

Garrett Mattson

Gabriel Biello

Alan W Karpinski

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

HOT PURSUIT

HABEAS CORPUS

DIRECTED VERDICT

PROBABLE CAUSE

CRIMINAL LAW

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

State v. Machuca

Prior v. Department of Revenue

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS