Toccoa DUI-DWI Lawyer, Georgia, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ronald Baker
About | Practice Areas
Ronald Baker Attorney at Law
11877 Douglas Rd Suite 102191 Johns Creek, GA 30005» view map
Intellectual Property Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Ronald Baker is a practicing lawyer in Georgia who handles cases involving Intellectual Property Law.

800-597-8640
1. Ronald Baker Johns Creek, GA
  Attorney at Law- GA
  Walter F. George School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutRonald Baker Attorney at Law
  Working Relentlessly For You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Intellectual Property Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

John W. Timmons

Personal Injury, Felony, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights

Status:

CONTACT

244 E. Washington Street, Athens, GA 30601

John Jay Mcarthur

Education, Landlord-Tenant, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Car Accident

Status:

CONTACT

269 N Jackson Street, Athens, GA 30603

Barry E. King

Criminal, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law, Traffic

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

27 City Square, Hoschton, GA 30548

C. David Turk

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

Dahlonega, GA 30533

William John Schneider

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Traffic, Wills, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

5505 Golf Club Drive, Braselton, GA 30517

Stanton Edward Porter

Government, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

73 Church Street, Winder, GA 30680

Hal Douglas Mitchell

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

81 West Athens Street, Winder, GA 30680

Nathan Andrew Crawford

Divorce, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy & Debt, Personal Injury, Wills

Status: Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

652 Barrow Park Drive, Winder, GA 30680

Dale R. Samuels

Landlord-Tenant, Land Use & Zoning, Government, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

Buford, GA 30515

Preston Fleming

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic, Business Organization

Licensed: 6 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

Dacula, GA 30019

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

... Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the grant of a defendant's motion to suppress the results of a State-administered breath test where an officer who had probable cause to arrest a defendant for DUI read the implied consent rights of OCGA Â§ 40-5-55[ [2] ] to the defendant ...

State v. Rish

... In granting that motion, the trial court found that the State lacked probable cause to arrest Rish for DUI-less safe (OCGA Â§ 40-6-391(a)(1)). While we affirm the trial court's ruling on this issue, we also find that, as a matter of law, the State did have probable cause to arrest Rish for ...

Wade v. State

... Following a bench trial, factually stipulated for trial purposes (to preclude the State's witnesses from having to appear), while preserving the due process issues for appellate review, Brittany Wade appeals her conviction of DUI less-safe, [1] contending that her bent of mind or ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Toccoa DUI-DWI Lawyer, Georgia, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Ronald Baker Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John W. Timmons

John Jay Mcarthur

Barry E. King

C. David Turk

William John Schneider

Stanton Edward Porter

Hal Douglas Mitchell

Nathan Andrew Crawford

Dale R. Samuels

Preston Fleming

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

MENS REA

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

PLEA BARGAIN

INDECENT EXPOSURE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SENTENCE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

PROSECUTOR

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

State v. Rish

Wade v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS