Welaka Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Caleb Suszko
About | Practice Areas
The C. Suszko Law Firm PLLC
Valrico, FL 33596» view map
DUI-DWI
Dedicated Advocate On Your Side

You need an advocate that will listen to you and help you navigate the legal system. At The C. Suszko Law Firm PLLC, I focus on DUI law and I'm here for you.

800-899-6881
1. Caleb Suszko Valrico, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2020
  Stetson University J.D. 2020
2. AboutThe C. Suszko Law Firm PLLC
  Dedicated Advocate On Your Side
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  DUI-DWI
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert McHenry Fields

Civil Rights, Personal Injury, Family Law, Criminal, Estate

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

413 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Garry Wood

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

415 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Ronald E Clark

Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status:

CONTACT

501 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

James P. Neshewat

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Contract

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

601 Saint Johns Ave, Palatka, FL 32177

Edward E Hedstrom

Motor Vehicle, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

601 Saint Johns Ave, Palatka, FL 32177

Benjamin C Christian

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

514 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Alexander Joseph Gilewicz

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

410 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Cara Fraser

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

410 Saint Johns Ave, Fort Mc Coy, FL 32177

Kenneth James Janesk

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

410 Saint Johns Ave, Palatka, FL 32177

Kevin Robert Monahan

Real Estate, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

Palatka, FL 32178

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Welaka Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

The C. Suszko Law Firm PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert McHenry Fields

Garry Wood

Ronald E Clark

James P. Neshewat

Edward E Hedstrom

Benjamin C Christian

Alexander Joseph Gilewicz

Cara Fraser

Kenneth James Janesk

Kevin Robert Monahan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MOTION IN LIMINE

EAVESDROPPING

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

JUSTICE SYSTEM

FEDERAL COURT

GRAND JURY

CAPITAL CASE

ARREST

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS