West Farmington Criminal Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Sean Logue
Google+ | Contact Us
Sean Logue & Associates
200 First Avenue 3rd Floor #301A Pittsburgh, PA 15222 » view map
DUI, Sex Crimes, Drug Crimes, Expungements
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Our lawyers bring a thorough understanding of criminal issues to help minimize the damage that a DUI charge can bring to our clients.

412-389-0805
1. Sean Logue Pittsburgh, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2008
  West Virginia, J.D. - 2007
2. Google+
  Visit us and follow on Google+ to interact on social media.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Free initial consultation. Contact us today.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael Edward Bloom

Social Security, Criminal, Disability, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

5603 Mahoning Ave, Warren, OH 44483

Irene K. Makridis

Foreclosure, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

155 South Park Avenue, Warren, OH 44481

Gregory Vincent Hicks

Litigation, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

391 Mahoning Ave Nw, Warren, OH 44483

Daniel Gerard Keating

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

170 Monroe Street, Nw, Warren, OH 44483

Gary Robert Rich

Federal Appellate Practice, Estate, Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

342 Mahoning Avenue N.W., Warren, OH 44483

Patricia Leopardi Knepp

Personal Injury, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

409 Harmon Ave Nw, Warren, OH 44482

William John Danso

Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

160 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

Gina Buccino Arnaut

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

160 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

Christopher Dean Becker

Litigation, Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

160 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

Jeffrey Ryan Davis

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

161 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

... Court of Ohio. However, for criminal sentences imposed on and after July 11, 2006, in which a trial court failed to properly impose postrelease control, trial courts shall apply the procedures set forth in RC 2929.191. {Â¶ 2} In this ...

State v. Colon

... Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. MOYER, CJ. ...

State v. Baker

... We have previously determined that "in order to decide whether an order issued by a trial court in a criminal proceeding is a reviewable final order, appellate courts should apply the definitions of `final order' contained in RC 2505.02." State v. Muncie (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 440 ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

West Farmington Criminal Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Sean Logue & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael Edward Bloom

Irene K. Makridis

Gregory Vincent Hicks

Daniel Gerard Keating

Gary Robert Rich

Patricia Leopardi Knepp

William John Danso

Gina Buccino Arnaut

Christopher Dean Becker

Jeffrey Ryan Davis

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

PROSECUTOR

PLEA

PROBABLE CAUSE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

HABEAS CORPUS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SEARCH WARRANT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

State v. Colon

State v. Baker

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS