Woodstock DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gordon H. Hirsch
About | Practice Areas
Hirsch Law Group
128 N. Scott St. Joliet, IL 60432» view map
Criminal Defense Law
We Defend Tough Cases

From simple, petty cases to the most complex criminal charges, we are dedicated to providing aggressive legal services to our clients.

800-878-2530
1. Gordon H. Hirsch Joliet, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 2000
  DePaul University J.D. 2000
2. AboutHirsch Law Group
  Former Prosecutor Turned Aggressive Criminal Defense Attorney
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

William Bligh

Criminal, Traffic, Welfare, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

4 East Terra Cotta Avenue, Crystal Lake, IL 60014

Norman Pollock

Wills & Probate, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Divorce

Status: Licensed: 60 Years

CONTACT

100 W Washington St, Marengo, IL 60152

Carey Schulze

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Collection

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

17 E Ave, Crystal Lake, IL 60014

Donald Franz

Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

3 North Williams Street, Crystal Lake, IL 60014

Mark Facchini

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

4310 Crystal Lake Road, Mchenry, IL 60050

Jeffrey Altman

Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

4310 Crystal Lake Road, Mchenry, IL 60050

Edward Donahue

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

4310 Crystal Lake Road, Mchenry, IL 60050

John Ridgway

Bankruptcy, DUI-DWI, Traffic, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

4310 Crystal Lake Road, Mchenry, IL 60050

Myrna Smith

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Divorce, Transactions

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

1400 S. Il Rt. 31, McHenry, IL 60050

Karlen Robert Covey

Bankruptcy, Civil Rights, DUI-DWI, Divorce

Status: Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

7105 Virginia Road, Crystal Lake, IL 60014

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

... objection, dismissed the three citations and recharged defendant, in an information, with driving with a blood-alcohol content over 0.08, noting in the charge the existence of the sentence-enhancing factor (driving on a revoked license), which elevated the DUI offense to ...

People v. Gonzalez

... begin there. Prior to January 1, 2006, section 11-501 provided that driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) constituted aggravated DUI in six instances, none of which are relevant to further discussion. However, section ...

People v. Prouty

... After a bench trial, defendant, Edmund T. Prouty, was convicted of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 â€” 501(d)(1)(A) (West 2006)). ... The indictment stated that aggravated DUI was a Class 2 felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Woodstock DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Hirsch Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

William Bligh

Norman Pollock

Carey Schulze

Donald Franz

Mark Facchini

Jeffrey Altman

Edward Donahue

John Ridgway

Myrna Smith

Karlen Robert Covey

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PROBABLE CAUSE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

LARCENY

ACTUS REUS

HOMICIDE

INFORMATION

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

BURDEN OF PROOF

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

People v. Gonzalez

People v. Prouty

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS