Blacklick DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Sean Flaherty
About | Practice Areas
Keches Law Group
122 Dean Street Taunton, MA 02780» view map
Social Security, Personal Injury, Workers Comp.
Protecting Your Rights

Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys has over 130 years of combined experience representing individuals and families injured due to the negligence of others.

800-713-8650
1. Sean Flaherty Taunton, MA
  Attorney at Law - MA, 2006
  New England School of Law J.D.
2. AboutKeches Law Group
  We are attorneys that care.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Social Security
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Shawn R. Dominy

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

1900 Polaris Parkway, Columbus, OH 43240

Katarina Valentina Schmidt

Visa, Wills, DUI-DWI, Disability, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

695 Vivian Ct, Columbus, OH 43230

Richard Francis Swope

Traffic, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 69 Years

CONTACT

6480 E Main St, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068

Ben B. Weisbuch

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

2460 Berwick Blvd., Columbus, OH 43209

Mohammad Salman Shah

Litigation, DUI-DWI, Collection, Medical Malpractice

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

2295 East Livingston Ave., Columbus, OH 43209

James Lyle Dye

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

38 East Columbus Street, Pickerington, OH 43147

Luther Mills

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Divorce & Family Law, Family Law

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

623 Park Meadow Rd, Westerville, OH 43081

Chase Alan Mallory

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

580 E Rich St, Westerville, OH 43215

Daniel James Sabol

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

580 E Rich St, Columbus, OH 43215

David Bennett Schultz

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

580 E. Rich St., Cincinnati, OH 45215

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

... consider the constitutionality of RC 4511.19(A)(2), which requires the imposition of criminal penalties upon certain persons who refuse to consent to chemical testing after being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a drug of abuse ("DUI"). ...

State v. Bragwell

... {Â¶2} On May 25, 2006, a Mahoning County grand jury indicted appellant on one count of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), a third-degree felony in violation of RC ... Appellant entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and specifications. This was appellant's thirteenth DUI. ...

State v. DETSKAS

... This question is relevant because Detskas was previously convicted in Michigan, under that state's law, for the offense of driving while impaired (DWI) (a lesser included offense of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Blacklick DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Keches Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Shawn R. Dominy

Katarina Valentina Schmidt

Richard Francis Swope

Ben B. Weisbuch

Mohammad Salman Shah

James Lyle Dye

Luther Mills

Chase Alan Mallory

Daniel James Sabol

David Bennett Schultz

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

GRAND JURY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SPECIFIC INTENT

MOTION IN LIMINE

EXPUNGE

IMPEACH

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

State v. Bragwell

State v. DETSKAS

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS