Bloomfield DUI-DWI Lawyer, Connecticut, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ryan P. Barry
About | Practice Areas
Barry, Barall & Spinella, LLC
989 Main St Manchester, CT 06040» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Your Future Matters To Us

At Barry, Barall & Spinella, LLC, our only goal is to protect your best interests. We are accomplished attorneys whose focus is handling criminal defense & personal injury claims.

800-998-0430
1. Ryan P. Barry Manchester, CT
  Attorney at Law - CT, 2000
  University of Connecticut J.D. 1999
2. AboutBarry, Barall & Spinella, LLC
  Your Future Matters To Us
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Angel Alberto Lugo

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Identity Theft, Slip & Fall Accident

Status: Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

101 Lafayette Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Mary De Castro Foden

Traffic, Immigration, Child Custody, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

107 Oak St, Hartford, CT 06106

Mark D. Colson

Litigation, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury

Status:

CONTACT

102 Oak Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Teri E. Bayer

DUI-DWI, Child Support

Status:

CONTACT

250 Main Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Peter Odium

Social Security -- Disability, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

250 Main Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Stanley Peck

Health Care, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Medical Malpractice

Status: Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

8 Parish Road, Farmington, CT 06032

Robert Knight

Employment, Criminal, Consumer Protection, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

15b N Granby Rd, Granby, CT 06035

Christopher Joseph Brenes

Personal Injury, Criminal, Litigation, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

21 Oak Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Joyce A Lagnese

Lawsuit & Dispute, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

21 Oak Street, Hartford, CT 06106

Robert B Muchinsky

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Consumer Rights, Felony

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

39 Russ Street, Hartford, CT 06106

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

FELONY

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases... (more...)

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases, by death. For example, murder, extortion and kidnapping are felonies; a minor fist fight is usually charged as a misdemeanor, and a speeding ticket is generally an infraction.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Fontaine

... 919, 883 A.2d 1246 (2005). [4] During his examination by the state, Abely testified that when Roberts asked the defendant for his operator's license, the defendant replied, "[y]ou don't need a license to operate a moped . . . give me a break, I just got out on a DWI offense . . . ...

State v. Fontaine

... 919, 883 A.2d 1246 (2005). [4] During his examination by the state, Abely testified that when Roberts asked the defendant for his operator's license, the defendant replied, "[y]ou don't need a license to operate a moped ... give me a break, I just got out on a DWI offense ... ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bloomfield DUI-DWI Lawyer, Connecticut, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Barry, Barall & Spinella, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Angel Alberto Lugo

Mary De Castro Foden

Mark D. Colson

Teri E. Bayer

Peter Odium

Stanley Peck

Robert Knight

Christopher Joseph Brenes

Joyce A Lagnese

Robert B Muchinsky

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

JURY NULLIFICATION

WARRANT

INTENTIONAL TORT

INFORMED CONSENT

FELONY

JUSTICE SYSTEM

DIRECTED VERDICT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Fontaine

State v. Fontaine

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS