Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involoves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.


By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.

Charlotte Criminal Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm


Charles Linwood Morgan, Jr. Lawyer

Charles Linwood Morgan, Jr.

VERIFIED
DUI-DWI, Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime
focusing on criminal defense, from speeding tickets to murder and all things in between

Charles L. "Chuck" Morgan, Jr. has been representing the drinking driver and the criminally accused for over 30 years. Although his practice is based ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-746-2990

Jason H. Reece Lawyer

Jason H. Reece

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic

Lawyer.com Member Questionnaire

Please describe a case(s) in the last year or two where you made a big difference.
I... (more)

Ken  Harris Lawyer

Ken Harris

VERIFIED
Social Security, Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Car Accident
Focusing on Workers Compensation, Social Security, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice

Ken Harris and Associates was founded by Ken Harris a Fayetteville native who saw the need to provide tough and effective representation to a demandin... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-748-2791

Jefferson  Mabrito Lawyer

Jefferson Mabrito

Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal, Estate, Accident & Injury, Real Estate

Jefferson Mabrito is the principal attorney of The Mabrito Law Firm, serving clients throughout the State of North Carolina. Jefferson Mabrito has ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT
Paulina N. Havelka Lawyer

Paulina N. Havelka

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Immigration, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Personal Injury

Lawyer.com Member Questionnaire

Please describe a case(s) in the last year or two where you made a big difference.
I... (more)

Eddie  Meeks Lawyer

Eddie Meeks

VERIFIED
DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Family Law

Whether you've been arrested and charged with a crime or you need someone to help you through your divorce, call Eddie L. Meeks Attorney at Law. Eddie... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-614-3910

Timothy Michael Cannady Lawyer

Timothy Michael Cannady

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Traffic

Timothy Cannady grew up in a small town in Georgia, where he graduated high school from LaGrange Academy. After attending Auburn University he chose ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-772-4071

Kirk Robert Lundell Lawyer

Kirk Robert Lundell

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Employment, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Following a successful 15-year career managing several well-known retail stores throughout the country, Mr. Lundell decided to refocus his passion for... (more)

Gary Wayne Stiltner Lawyer

Gary Wayne Stiltner

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Traffic, Family Law, Adoption

Stiltner Law Firm, PLLC. is the law office of Gary W. Stiltner. Mr. Stiltner was born to a working class family in the small town of Grundy, Virginia.... (more)

Thomas H. Ainsworth

Animal Bite, Criminal, Bad Faith, Dental Malpractice, Mediation
Status:  In Good Standing           

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.


Display Sponsorship

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Charlotte Criminal Lawyers and Charlotte Criminal Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Criminal practice areas such as DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act and White Collar Crime matters.

LEGAL TERMS

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)
A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)
A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)
The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)
A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)
In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)
A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)
The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)
A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Bare

... 1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law; and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action. 2d. ... A. Legislative Intent. Whether a statutory scheme is civil or criminal is first of all a question of statutory construction. ...

Dogwood Dev. & Mgmt. v. White Oak Transport

... For instance, plain error review is available in criminal appeals, Odom, 307 NC at 660, 300 SE2d at 378, for challenges to jury instructions and evidentiary issues, State v. Cummings, 352 NC 600, 613, 536 SE2d 36, 47 (2000), cert. denied, 532 US 997, 121 S.Ct. ...

State v. Styles

... Under Terry and subsequent cases, a traffic stop is permitted if the officer has a "reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot." Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 US 119, 123, 120 S.Ct. 673, 675, 145 L.Ed.2d 570, 576 (2000). ...