Deerfield Criminal Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

William Mooney
About | Practice Areas
Mooney Law Office
124 Middle Ave Suite M Elyria, OH 44035» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Diligently Defending & Protecting

Our attorney never backs down from a case and will fight fervently to minimize or eliminate the consequences of a criminal conviction.

216-973-7080
1. William Mooney Elyria, OH
  Attorney at Law - OH, 2011
  Cleveland State University J.D. 2011
2. AboutMooney Law Office
  Diligently Defending & Protecting Constitutional Rights
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Joseph W. Gardner

Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Immigration, International, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

1386 Ne River Rd, Lake Milton, OH 44429

Joe Gardner

Personal Injury, Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

1386 Ne River Rd, Lake Milton, OH 44429

Theresa Taylor Tolson

Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

18495 5Th St, Beloit, OH 44609

Jeffrey Max Haupt

Workers' Compensation, Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

526 E Main St, Alliance, OH 44601

John Thomas Jakmides

Family Law, Medical Malpractice, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

325 E Main St, Alliance, OH 44601

Coleen Hall Dailey

Estate, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

323 E Main St, Alliance, OH 44601

Caity Weyer

Trusts, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

470 E Market St, Alliance, OH 44601

Matthew Scott Kuhn

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

470 East Market Street, Alliance, OH 44601

Andrew Lawrence Zumbar

Family Law, Criminal, Corporate, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

470 E Market St, Alliance, OH 44601

Caitlyn Rhea Schneider

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

470 E Market St, Alliance, OH 44601

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

... Court of Ohio. However, for criminal sentences imposed on and after July 11, 2006, in which a trial court failed to properly impose postrelease control, trial courts shall apply the procedures set forth in RC 2929.191. {Â¶ 2} In this ...

State v. Colon

... Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. MOYER, CJ. ...

State v. Baker

... We have previously determined that "in order to decide whether an order issued by a trial court in a criminal proceeding is a reviewable final order, appellate courts should apply the definitions of `final order' contained in RC 2505.02." State v. Muncie (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 440 ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Deerfield Criminal Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Mooney Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Joseph W. Gardner

Joe Gardner

Theresa Taylor Tolson

Jeffrey Max Haupt

John Thomas Jakmides

Coleen Hall Dailey

Caity Weyer

Matthew Scott Kuhn

Andrew Lawrence Zumbar

Caitlyn Rhea Schneider

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

FEDERAL COURT

MOTION IN LIMINE

SELF-DEFENSE

ARREST

JUSTICE SYSTEM

JURY NULLIFICATION

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

NOLO CONTENDERE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

State v. Colon

State v. Baker

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS