Delphos DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Sean Flaherty
About | Practice Areas
Keches Law Group
122 Dean Street Taunton, MA 02780» view map
Social Security, Personal Injury, Workers Comp.
Protecting Your Rights

Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys has over 130 years of combined experience representing individuals and families injured due to the negligence of others.

800-713-8650
1. Sean Flaherty Taunton, MA
  Attorney at Law - MA, 2006
  New England School of Law J.D.
2. AboutKeches Law Group
  We are attorneys that care.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Social Security
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Delphos DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Delphos Criminal lawyers.

Andrew R. Bucher

Traffic, Estate Planning, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1728 Allentown Road, Lima, OH 45805

Shelby Core

Trusts, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 7 Years

CONTACT

540 W Market St, Lima, OH 45801

F. Stephen Chamberlain

Family Law, Litigation, Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

212 N Elizabeth St, Lima, OH 45802

Paul Thomas Ferri

DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

540 W. Market Street, Lima, OH 45801

Farley Keith Banks

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy & Debt, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

Lima, OH 45801

Thomas John Lucente

DUI-DWI, Trademark, Traffic, Consumer Bankruptcy

Status:

CONTACT

5 Willipie Street, Wapakoneta, OH 45895

John James Hopkins

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Malpractice

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

814 N Locust St, Ottawa, OH 45875

Nicholas John Clark

Real Estate, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

214 W 2Nd St, Delphos, OH 45833

Carlene Huston-Kinworthy

Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

565 Wakashan Trail, Lima, OH 45805

Andy Bucher

Personal Injury, Trusts, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

1728 Allentown Rd, Lima, OH 45805

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

FELONY

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases... (more...)

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases, by death. For example, murder, extortion and kidnapping are felonies; a minor fist fight is usually charged as a misdemeanor, and a speeding ticket is generally an infraction.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

... consider the constitutionality of RC 4511.19(A)(2), which requires the imposition of criminal penalties upon certain persons who refuse to consent to chemical testing after being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a drug of abuse ("DUI"). ...

State v. Bragwell

... {Â¶2} On May 25, 2006, a Mahoning County grand jury indicted appellant on one count of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), a third-degree felony in violation of RC ... Appellant entered pleas of not guilty to the charge and specifications. This was appellant's thirteenth DUI. ...

State v. DETSKAS

... This question is relevant because Detskas was previously convicted in Michigan, under that state's law, for the offense of driving while impaired (DWI) (a lesser included offense of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Delphos DUI-DWI Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Keches Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Andrew R. Bucher

Shelby Core

F. Stephen Chamberlain

Paul Thomas Ferri

Farley Keith Banks

Thomas John Lucente

John James Hopkins

Nicholas John Clark

Carlene Huston-Kinworthy

Andy Bucher

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

FELONY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CONVICTION

ACQUITTAL

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

MENS REA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Hoover

State v. Bragwell

State v. DETSKAS

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS