Law Offices Of The Public Defender

Lawyers
Aaron Benjamin Kurtzer
Criminal, General Practice,
Colleen A. Lawler
Joelle Abbott Moore
General Practice,
Juliet Drucilla Grossman
Criminal, Estate Planning, General Practice,
Kara A Hyland
Susanne Marie Huerta
General Practice,
Whitney Ruth Ryan
Criminal, Government, General Practice,
Reviews

All they do is set you up to fail, its a public “ pretender “ not defender! They dont fight for you. They let the da make their decisions and its final! They wont argue for you or anything your better off with a paid attorney
My trial lawyer Briones-Coleman told me that he was an alcoholic and drank heavily. Not any of them ever fought for me, ever defended me in the manner I asked and they did not fight to keep the marijuana cultivation charge out of court because they listened to the Riverside County Judge who listened to the D.A. who argued that I had no medical marijuana defense because I only had an oral prescription from my Doctor. They are wrong and the law specifically states oral prescription is just as valid as written. They would not defend my right to threaten anyone I have a cause to threaten as I still maintain and continue to do adding more Judges and officials to the list of persons I name for execution and disposal. These people are vile in my view, they make far to much and do nothing to benefit anyone.This counties Judges and law authorities are corrupt and I pray the anger and violence of the people and God and all against them. I was convicted on testimony of a cop who was busted later on for corruption he committed from before and during and after he busted me. A dirty cop that conspired with a dirty biased Riverside County Judge. The convictions were overthrown save the one I plea bargained to after it was tried and ruled a mistrial and they were going to re-prosecute save I pleaded guilty to it as a misdemeanor. In says I threatened the school by PC and Phone and Public Post to a chat room. This charge was the same on harassing them with the use of the electronic devices they contend I threatened with. the harassment guilty charge was overturned as being not guilty. If I did not use my PC and phone to harass them then how can I be guilty of the greater harassment of threatening them? Go figure why that f-ing court has written on its side, logic is the base of law, what logic is there in this? That whole court and the judges and people in it that work there or about it should all be burnt alive in hades and the people should slay the whole lot of them all before I bring this very fire from heaven on the heads of well lets say everyone.